Chit Chat 09Nov09

9 November 2009 at 13:57
By

Chit Chat is on…………………….

Share on TwitterSubmit to StumbleUponSave on DeliciousDigg ThisShare via email

168 Responses to Chit Chat 09Nov09

  1. mikka on 9 November 2009 at 14:42

    eye,lyons was on in session show last week,talk about another case,she was so unfriendly and biotchy!

  2. madmaxi on 9 November 2009 at 14:01

    first lol????

  3. smoke&mirrors on 9 November 2009 at 14:01

    2nd

  4. stephanie on 9 November 2009 at 14:02

    3rd

  5. stephanie on 9 November 2009 at 14:03

    Mikka…wake up they are talking about the docs on prime news

  6. stephanie on 9 November 2009 at 14:03

    Hi Smoke and Madm

  7. mikka on 9 November 2009 at 14:03

    hhhiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii

  8. stephanie on 9 November 2009 at 14:04

    Hi Mikka

  9. eyespy on 9 November 2009 at 14:04

    Hiya Steph, Madi

  10. smoke&mirrors on 9 November 2009 at 14:04

    Hi stephanie!

    BBL

  11. mikka on 9 November 2009 at 14:04

    steph,i watch teh dreamteam is on ,pam,mike,marc :lol: :lol:

  12. eyespy on 9 November 2009 at 14:05

    I dont have the tv on, what are they saying?

    Hi Mikka…

  13. madmaxi on 9 November 2009 at 14:05

    hey stephanie, smoke and mikka….
    eyespy,, that is good thought.. maybe her partial truth was the daddy set up trust fund!!! and geo actually set one up for caylee???? how funny.. cause, I really cant imagine a young guy doing a trust fund and NOT doing child support….
    bbl all, gotto go cook…. shephards pie..

  14. stephanie on 9 November 2009 at 14:07

    HB Smoke

    Mikka…lol

    Eyes…Pam thinks the chloroform is huge for the state because of her searches before hand. Marc said that the defense will say it was someone else’s because no prints. mike said lets wait and see if there are prints to come…and so on, lol

  15. stephanie on 9 November 2009 at 14:08

    Mikka…I watched a prosecutor last night you would really like…she is in Houston…let me see if I can find her name

  16. mikka on 9 November 2009 at 14:08

    eye,the prosecution have a good case,and cma look up chloroform on the internet and decomp was on teh papertowls,and cma was talking with tracy(L.P) about the rapp drug and chloroform!mike say more docs to come……

  17. stephanie on 9 November 2009 at 14:11

    The bug info…coffin flies they are talking about

  18. eyespy on 9 November 2009 at 14:11

    Mikka, Steph
    Has the defense commented on the latest docs yet, did i miss Bozo spinning out of this one yet?

  19. mikka on 9 November 2009 at 14:11

    steph,i am not concerned,body was in teh trunk
    1.the smell
    2.dogs alarmed in trunk
    3.hair with deatband
    4.papertowl with decomp
    5.coffinflies
    6.airtest
    7.chloroform

    GUILTY,GUILTY

  20. mikka on 9 November 2009 at 14:12

    eye no what will bozo say??the flies lie?? :lol: :lol:

  21. maze on 9 November 2009 at 14:13

    I think jesse better be prepared for whats coming

  22. stephanie on 9 November 2009 at 14:14

    Mikka…So very true. I am with you and not worried at all. Did you hear Pam say…she doesn’t like to use the words “slam dunk?” But, this is about as close as you can get…i like her.

  23. mikka on 9 November 2009 at 14:14

    maze no i am not worried,teh nanny did it!

  24. stephanie on 9 November 2009 at 14:15

    I think Amy and her gang Ricardo and TL better be too. They will try and make everyone look bad and seedy on the stand.

  25. mikka on 9 November 2009 at 14:15

    steph,jury will believe the body was in the trunk and the rest is history!

  26. eyespy on 9 November 2009 at 14:15

    I read part of fannings interview over at mysteries….Steph you will like this one , never thought of it: Cindy will garner NO sympathy from the jury when it comes to the penalty phase,begging for mercy for Caseys life because she has lost all credibility…..

  27. maze on 9 November 2009 at 14:16

    the conversations with Tracy will be considered hearsay and not admissable I would assume.

  28. mikka on 9 November 2009 at 14:17

    steph,nobody say cindy say she locked up chloroform! :w00t:

  29. mikka on 9 November 2009 at 14:17

    maze,no tracy will be a witness at trial,for the prosecution!

  30. maze on 9 November 2009 at 14:18

    Mikka I thought Oj would have been found gulity…could not believe that verdict!!

  31. eyespy on 9 November 2009 at 14:18

    Good list Mikka :lol: What more do they need….oh plus they just might have the pictures of her body outline in the trunk also

  32. mikka on 9 November 2009 at 14:18

    eye i read this,fanning is right,may cindy can begging no more,when she get locked up too,for lying under oath!

  33. maze on 9 November 2009 at 14:19

    eye never thought of that but your right

  34. mikka on 9 November 2009 at 14:19

    maze,much people loved o.j on this time and he had so much better lawyers!cma is not o.j!

  35. mikka on 9 November 2009 at 14:20

    eye and i forget
    8.geo,fbi, L.E smell teh decomp and the car still smells!

  36. stephanie on 9 November 2009 at 14:20

    I agree Mikka…lol

    Hi Maze…I don’t know that will be the case. Today I listened to a girl tell what the accused said in court. I get really confused on which is hearsay and which is not…i am going to see if I can find that.
    I think sometimes they have you tell what all you said…

    Eyes…I have no doubt Cindy will garner NO sympathy…she took herself out of victims status when she decided to cover up for Casey and than live off blood money, imo

  37. stephanie on 9 November 2009 at 14:22

    Eyes…I thought it was fanning but not sure. Thought there should be a book when this is all over how Casey became who she is…kind of a dissection of them all…because they are all very dysfunctional.

  38. eyespy on 9 November 2009 at 14:22

    Hi Maze
    Fanning had an interview with 48 hours…..gosh that show is busy with this case!!

    Mikka
    I think the state will use Geo and Cindy on the stand and then pop them with warrent for being STUPID liars!!

  39. maze on 9 November 2009 at 14:23

    we can only hope for that eye

  40. mikka on 9 November 2009 at 14:24

    eye :lol: at trial, it works like this,when she ask geo about the smell and he say ,he dont cant remember,prosecution will show him what he say about the smell,jury will see both are cover up and lying!

  41. maze on 9 November 2009 at 14:25

    I hope they fry this guy hasan also…

  42. mikka on 9 November 2009 at 14:25

    eye,teh anthonys dont will talk with fanning,because fanning dont pay him!

  43. mikka on 9 November 2009 at 14:26

    maze,dont worry,my hubby is in the army,this hassan when he is fit,he get his military trial,he will get life in a militaryprison with hard labor!

  44. maze on 9 November 2009 at 14:27

    I predict that one of them will be incapable of testifying for some reason..

  45. stephanie on 9 November 2009 at 14:27

    I believe it will be let in…Here is a part of the rule and there is no absolute rule. Also the link

    Theory of The Hearsay Rule

    The theory of the rule excluding hearsay is that assertions made by human beings are often unreliable; such statements are often insincere, subject to flaws in memory and perception, or infected with errors in narration at the time they are given. The law therefore finds it necessary to subject this form of evidence to “scrutiny or analysis calculated to discover and expose in detail its possible weaknesses, and thus to enable the tribunal (judge or jury) to estimate it at no more than its actual value”.[3]

    Three tests are calculated to expose possible weaknesses in a statement:

    1. Assertions must be taken under oath
    2. Assertions must be made in front of the tribunal (judge or jury)
    3. Assertions must be subject to cross-examination.

    Assertions not subject to these three tests are (with some exceptions) prohibited insofar as they are offered testimonially (for the truth of what they assert).
    [edit] Federal Rules of Evidence

    The Federal Rules of Evidence (See Article VIII) provide a general definition of hearsay as a “statement, other than one made by the declarant while testifying at the trial or hearing, offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted.” Subject to two classes of “exemptions,” this definition classifies a statement as hearsay if the statement meets two requirements: (1) the statement must be extra-judicial (i.e. not made by this witness in this proceeding). (2) The statement must be offered to prove the truth of what the statement asserts if anything.

    However, as noted below, the Federal Rules of Evidence also provide two specific categories of exemptions of certain kinds of statements from this rule; statements in these categories are defined as “Non-hearsay.”

    Typically, one can classify a statement as hearsay under the Federal Rules of Evidence using a three-step analysis. A statement will be considered hearsay if it is:

    1. An assertive statement
    2. Made by an out-of-court declarant
    3. Is being offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted therein.

    An “assertive statement” is generally defined as the intentional communication of fact. Under the Federal Rules of Evidence, an assertive statement can be oral, written, or non-verbal conduct if it was intended to be an assertion. However, any verbal or non-verbal conduct that was not intended to communicate a fact will not be considered an assertive statement.

    In order for the statement to satisfy the “out-of-court declarant” element of hearsay, very simply stated, the statement must have been made outside of the courtroom that the present proceeding is taking place in — meaning that if the statement was made in another courtroom, it is still made by an “out-of-court” declarant.

    Lastly, if a statement is being offered for its truth — meaning that its relevance depends upon the jury believing the substance of the statement — then it is being offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted therein. If a statement is relevant for any other purpose other than proving the truth of the matter asserted therein, then the statement will not be considered hearsay under the Federal Rules of Evidence.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hearsay_in_United_States_law

  46. Mimi of 2 on 9 November 2009 at 14:27

    Casey’s car was at the towyard from 30Jun – 15Jul08. This picture below, looks like that car is sooo clean you could see your reflection in it! WHO cleaned this car? I’m telling you, this car was ‘detailed out’ it’s amazing to me…!

    Georgie and SINdy KNEW what had been in the trunk and immediately began to cover. I cannot wait until they arrest Sindy and Georgie-pooh for Obstruction of Justice and/or Accessory after the Fact.!!

    http://www.clickorlando.com/slideshow/news/17315856/detail.html?qs=1;s=1;p=news&dm=ss&tn=b

    Oops, forgot to say HI to all of you guys. :smile:

  47. maze on 9 November 2009 at 14:28

    I say put him up in front of firing squad let them have at it!!!!

  48. eyespy on 9 November 2009 at 14:30

    Mikka
    I wonder if they really will try to lie on the stand, knowing thats what everyone expects.If the state shows they are hostile witness’s do they (the jury)have to diregard anything they say?

  49. mikka on 9 November 2009 at 14:30

    ssshhhhhh from a blogger sshhhhhh

    That is not all they have, media is not yet reporting it but she also had poisonous liquid in the car, taken into evidence. It is item designated 241 among docs released yesterday. Testing reveals it contains pesticide ingredients and wood alcohol. So you have a toxic and deadly liquid taken from her car and another toxic deadly liquid found along with remains….let’s see defense explain that away…the info starts on page #11481 and results of it are on page 11553

  50. maze on 9 November 2009 at 14:31

    mimi you are right i do not even see a water spot on the windshield

  51. stephanie on 9 November 2009 at 14:31

    Hi Mimi…How are you?

    They so covered up

  52. maze on 9 November 2009 at 14:32

    good job steph

  53. mikka on 9 November 2009 at 14:33

    eye,when teh anthonys make of hostile,jury think she cover 100% up for cma ,thats bad,really bad!

  54. mikka on 9 November 2009 at 14:34

    brb

  55. Mimi of 2 on 9 November 2009 at 14:34

    I’m doing well, Steph – thanks for asking.

    Trying to catch up on everything that’s going on, I’m still :lol: over Georgie’s cubic zirconia earrings. He just looks so stupid. :silly:

  56. stephanie on 9 November 2009 at 14:34

    It should be real interesting…I do think the nervous laugh she had will not be happening. Even though trial can be more nerve racking…it is also a formal proceeding and I don’t see her laughing like the le interview…at least I hope not, lol.

  57. humbleopinion on 9 November 2009 at 14:35

    56th

  58. stephanie on 9 November 2009 at 14:35

    Mikka…Thank you, I need to look that up.

    Mimi…He does look stupid

  59. eyespy on 9 November 2009 at 14:36

    Cindy will make a scene on the stand either way.I almost wish they wouldnt call her, she knows this will be her “cameo” performance…..

  60. mikka on 9 November 2009 at 14:39

    eye dont cant wait,jury say guilty,and cindy will scream teh jury is a**hole, bastards…………

  61. eyespy on 9 November 2009 at 14:39

    Hi Humble!!

    Mimi, have not seen you in so long, how are you?

    Steph can you imajine being in court with Giggles and Gigglette on the same day…

  62. mikka on 9 November 2009 at 14:39

    humble :w00t:

  63. Mimi of 2 on 9 November 2009 at 14:39

    eye: Sindy can’t resist being front and center…she’s gonna make a total arse out of herself on the stand. I can hardly wait!

  64. stephanie on 9 November 2009 at 14:40

    Hi Humble…lol

  65. eyespy on 9 November 2009 at 14:40

    Mikka
    Ha Ha and then she will go to the penalty phase and cry with lyons!!Nobody will believe them…

  66. Mimi of 2 on 9 November 2009 at 14:41

    Does anyone know the date, set for trial?

  67. mikka on 9 November 2009 at 14:41

    i want the team from csi miami on the cma case,it goes way quicker! :lol:

  68. mikka on 9 November 2009 at 14:42

    eye,lyons was on in session show last week,talk about another case,she was so unfriendly and biatchy!

  69. stephanie on 9 November 2009 at 14:42

    Eyes…I would love to be in court with them when the guilty verdict is read. We would all be cheering as Cindy is screaming you arsehole bas*ards, lol.
    Of course we would all be kicked out and hopefully Cindy would be arrested and we would all be cheering again, lol.

  70. Marsha on 9 November 2009 at 14:43

    Hi Everyone!

    Mikka, call them up and get them on the case! I have to go get my daughter. Yell if something good happens! I’ll catch up later!

  71. mikka on 9 November 2009 at 14:43

    mimi the fraudhearing is on the 11 december,the day she find caylee! teh trial???2022 hahahahahaha

  72. stephanie on 9 November 2009 at 14:43

    I thought it was set for June of next year…maybe oct. let me go look

  73. mikka on 9 November 2009 at 14:44

    marsha i love this show!bye see ya!

  74. stephanie on 9 November 2009 at 14:44

    Mimi…I don’t know where the link went to upcoming dates. But, there are also supposed to be some depos this week I believe

  75. stephanie on 9 November 2009 at 14:45

    Hi and bye Marsha

  76. Mimi of 2 on 9 November 2009 at 14:45

    I want to take a minute to say “thank you” to all here, and especially Humble for this wonderful blog site. I don’t know how I would have made it that last three months without all of you guys….thanks for keeping me company on many a long days & nights. :smile:

  77. humbleopinion on 9 November 2009 at 14:46

    Hi Eye! Good to see you!
    Mikka :blush:
    Hi ya Steph!
    Hi ya Marsha…
    Hi ya anyone I missed!

  78. humbleopinion on 9 November 2009 at 14:46

    Hi ya Mimi!

  79. mikka on 9 November 2009 at 14:46

    steph,yes kronk ! :w00t:

  80. mikka on 9 November 2009 at 14:46

    humble :w00t:

  81. eyespy on 9 November 2009 at 14:47

    BBIB

  82. Mimi of 2 on 9 November 2009 at 14:47

    Thanks Steph.

  83. humbleopinion on 9 November 2009 at 14:47

    :w00t: Mikka!

  84. humbleopinion on 9 November 2009 at 14:48

    Any news? No news good news?

  85. mikka on 9 November 2009 at 14:48

    humble no :w00t:

  86. stephanie on 9 November 2009 at 14:48

    Mikka…wasn’t the state going to be doing D Casey and Mallory this week or next too?

    Mimi :smilie:

  87. mikka on 9 November 2009 at 14:49

    humble is weird bozo say nothing or is the defense on a cruise! :lol:

  88. humbleopinion on 9 November 2009 at 14:49

    Mikka :ninja:

  89. mikka on 9 November 2009 at 14:50

    steph ,i think teh first week in december!

  90. Mimi of 2 on 9 November 2009 at 14:50

    Humble :w00t:

    Anyone seen eastcoastdeb lately? Haven’t seen her in a while.

  91. mikka on 9 November 2009 at 14:51

    mimi,we are glad you are here,you are true humble blogger! :wink:

  92. humbleopinion on 9 November 2009 at 14:51

    I have to run over to Niecey’s! I posted on her site and woohoo, I hit the submit button so hard I put her post back to where it was gone! :whistle: brb

  93. mikka on 9 November 2009 at 14:51

    mimi,no i dont saw her,hope she is o.k!

  94. mikka on 9 November 2009 at 14:52

    humble :lol: :lol:

  95. Mimi of 2 on 9 November 2009 at 14:52

    Mikka :w00t: I hope deb is OK too.

  96. humbleopinion on 9 November 2009 at 14:53

    ECDeb is good Mimi…she is taking a break right now!

  97. mikka on 9 November 2009 at 14:54

    hornsby :wub: :wub: :kissing: :heart:

    “My reaction is now I understand why the state attorney is seeking the death penalty. You now have the premeditation filled in. You now have the cause of death filled in,” attorney Richard Hornsby said.

    “They confirm Caylee was dead at the time Casey had the car. In fact, she was trying to conceal the car from everybody else,” Hornsby said of the so-called coffin flies found in Anthony’s car.

    Hornsby said that there are now multiple reliable scientific opinions based on insects, plant growth and from the medical examiner that the remains were dumped in late June or early July — not by someone else after Anthony was locked up as her defense argues.

    Hornsby said the syringe further removes reasonable doubt about how Caylee died.

    “The chloroform is the smoking gun. It’s the nail in the coffin, and the duct tape supports the imposition of the death penalty,” he said.

    Based on the new evidence, Hornsby said it’s time for Anthony’s defense team to strongly reconsider their all or nothing strategy.

  98. Mimi of 2 on 9 November 2009 at 14:54

    Thanks Humble, if you talk to her, tell her I said HI.
    :lol:

  99. Mimi of 2 on 9 November 2009 at 14:56

    Dinner time – bbl. :silly:

  100. mikka on 9 November 2009 at 14:57

    hahahahahahhahhaaha

    Based on the new evidence, Hornsby said it’s time for Anthony’s defense team to strongly reconsider their all or nothing strategy.

  101. stephanie on 9 November 2009 at 14:57

    Thank you Mikka…I think he is so right and don’t understand the defense continuing the way they are. Unless they think by going to trial they can get the jury to vote on a lesser charge…I think if they are thinking that…they are so WRONG.

  102. stephanie on 9 November 2009 at 14:57

    Mimi…HB and enjoy dinner

  103. eyespy on 9 November 2009 at 14:58

    Back!
    Steph, well we will all be here on that day cheering anyhow, hopefully it will be televised! Cant wait if it is to see the camera swing around to Cindys pinched mug!!

  104. mikka on 9 November 2009 at 14:58

    mimi bye see ya! :silly:

  105. mikka on 9 November 2009 at 14:59

    steph

    i think bozo want his trial,let him,i want her on death row!

  106. stephanie on 9 November 2009 at 15:00

    So does anyone have a really good pumkin pie receipe?? If so will you leave it on off topics for me, lol.
    I am also looking for a cherry pie reciepe…the kind where the top is like thick crumbs…thank you

  107. stephanie on 9 November 2009 at 15:01

    Mikka…I think you are right Mikka and that is has been the case since the beginning.

  108. humbleopinion on 9 November 2009 at 15:02

    Mrs. Smiths is very good Steph! :wink:

  109. mikka on 9 November 2009 at 15:02

    steph,no sorry,i never eat pumpkin pie!

  110. eyespy on 9 November 2009 at 15:02

    Mikka
    I agree with your boyfriend…he hasnt been wrong yet…And Steph i dont understand why either that they just keep on this road unless its Casey calling the shots.

  111. stephanie on 9 November 2009 at 15:03

    Mikka…I think if she had an attorney like Marc or Nejame…they would have made it real clear to her a long time ago which way this was going and how very strong the state’s case it against her…I bet they would have talked her into a plea long ago.

  112. mikka on 9 November 2009 at 15:03

    mike say,she find chloroform on caylees clothes????

  113. eyespy on 9 November 2009 at 15:03

    Humble :lol:

  114. mikka on 9 November 2009 at 15:04

    steph,when she take a plea and say it was an accident(not),she will be get may 10 years,i say no way!

  115. stephanie on 9 November 2009 at 15:04

    Humble…That is what I normally get. I bake a ton at Christmas but never pies…promised the youngest this year we will back the pies for Thanksgiving, lol.

    Mikka…I don’t like Pumpkin Pie either…I like the cherry pie

  116. stephanie on 9 November 2009 at 15:05

    I don’t think they would have given her only ten years…but they might have given her 25 with the chance of parole..It isn’t easy to get out on parole

  117. mikka on 9 November 2009 at 15:05

    pam say now i understand,florida law say,when a child died through accident,its 1 degree murder too! :smile:

  118. stephanie on 9 November 2009 at 15:06

    Let me take that back…It isn’t easy to get out on parole unless you are a sex offender

  119. mikka on 9 November 2009 at 15:06

    steph i too,love cherries! :biggrin:

  120. stephanie on 9 November 2009 at 15:07

    Mikka…Yes because what she was doing which was abuse…resulting in death

  121. mikka on 9 November 2009 at 15:07

    steph,no matter how,she dont will survive the first year in prison!

  122. eyespy on 9 November 2009 at 15:07

    Mikka she has to tell the TRUTH to get a plea accepted.There is to much evidence now that shows MURDER not an accident.Steph is right, if she plead long ago before they found any of this, she prolly would have got ten years….

  123. mikka on 9 November 2009 at 15:07

    steph,yes ,i :heart: the florida law!

  124. humbleopinion on 9 November 2009 at 15:07

    Mrs. Smith is my specialty…I make them from scratch. I scratch the box open.

    Mikka, Chloroform on her clothes? I must go and look!

  125. mikka on 9 November 2009 at 15:08

    eye,yes,but we know cma will never say what happens,she think she is smarter than everybody!

  126. stephanie on 9 November 2009 at 15:08

    Eyes…it is because Baez wants his trial…I really believe that and he told Casey in the beginning that they could beat this…no body. Than they found the remains and he was still as arrogant getting out in front of the cameras…he wants his trial.

  127. mikka on 9 November 2009 at 15:08

    humble yes,mike was saying this!

  128. mikka on 9 November 2009 at 15:09

    eye,we dont cant forget cma was convictet without a body!

  129. stephanie on 9 November 2009 at 15:10

    Humble…lol I also like the cobbler…mrs smith’s that is.

    I don’t remember chloroform on her clothes but am just half way through because I am blogging instead of reading, lol.

  130. watchestrainwreck on 9 November 2009 at 15:11

    Nice to see HLN talking about the case again. Think Nancy will do it again on her show tonight?

  131. stephanie on 9 November 2009 at 15:12

    Eyes…she wouldn’t have gotten only 10 yrs because they wouldn’t make a plea unless it included telling them where the remains were. Than what ever she told them for a plea the forensics would have to match up when they found the remains…She would have gotten a lot longer than 10 yrs but more than likely would have had a chance at parole. There isn’t any way she will now.

  132. mikka on 9 November 2009 at 15:12

    i know bozos next steph,he want from all 12 grandjury member,name,adresse,dna,fingerprints,phonerecords!!! :lol:

  133. mikka on 9 November 2009 at 15:12

    watches,bombshell tonight! :lol:

  134. stephanie on 9 November 2009 at 15:12

    Mikka…I agree she was convicted before the remains were found.

    Hi Watches…how are you? I am thinking she should there is a lot to talk about.

  135. stephanie on 9 November 2009 at 15:13

    Mikka…i could totally see that, lmbo

  136. mikka on 9 November 2009 at 15:13

    steph :lol:

  137. humbleopinion on 9 November 2009 at 15:15

    Interesting, what was just said about they will say someone else did it! WHO else hated Caylee that much? Only Casey! And it was a slap in Cindy’s face!

  138. stephanie on 9 November 2009 at 15:16

    Eyes…i saw earlier where you said that about Cindy wanting the fbi to come in. Isn’t it amazing that they wanted the fbi and she still wouldn’t cooperate? Oh wait I forgot they have nothing better to do than frame Casey for murdering her daughter. It is that influence Lawson has over them…he needed this so he could get re-elected, lol.

  139. mikka on 9 November 2009 at 15:17

    humble,teh jury dont will believe this,i am sure she will pick 12 smart citicens!

  140. stephanie on 9 November 2009 at 15:17

    So they think this guy knew the 9-11 hijackers?

  141. stephanie on 9 November 2009 at 15:18

    brb

  142. mikka on 9 November 2009 at 15:18

    now i understand bozos words
    “i dont know HOW i defend her” HAHAHA

  143. watchestrainwreck on 9 November 2009 at 15:20

    Major bombshell tonight Mikka!

    Hi Steph – I’m doing well. I have some catching up on the new developments to do. I’ve got the highlights – but I’ve diverted attention for a little bit to read the book.

  144. eyespy on 9 November 2009 at 15:20

    Steph
    Ha Ha yeah i saw that tape just recently, boy did she sound like a loon…

    I left you a cherry pie yummy on ot

  145. stephanie on 9 November 2009 at 15:32

    Mikka…LOL

    Watches…how did you like the book?

    Eyes…Thank you

  146. eyespy on 9 November 2009 at 15:36

    Mikka
    Ha Ha he NEVER did know how to defend her!

  147. stephanie on 9 November 2009 at 15:37

    So very true Eyes…lmbo

  148. CT~J4C on 9 November 2009 at 15:37

    Oy! Here for a very short time, whas’ up. eyespy!!! Hugs

  149. stephanie on 9 November 2009 at 15:39

    Hi CT…did you watch HLN talking about the case?

  150. CT~J4C on 9 November 2009 at 15:40

    No Steph, I barely put it on, I must be too late.

  151. CT~J4C on 9 November 2009 at 15:40

    Why Steph, whats going on??

  152. stephanie on 9 November 2009 at 15:41

    Pam the prosecutor from Florida said she doesn’t believe in using the words “slam dunk.” But, after this last doc from the plant expert, but expert and the chloroform it is as close as you get

  153. eyespy on 9 November 2009 at 15:42

    Ct!!!Whatcha doin?

  154. stephanie on 9 November 2009 at 15:42

    It was just nice to watch actually attorneys give their views…I totally agree with Pam too

  155. CT~J4C on 9 November 2009 at 15:43

    I knew it! Steph, go check my latest post on my blog, I think I’ve linked the syringe to the trunk, I think…I’m not a chemist, but check it out!!

    eyespy, I miss you every time!!! I will be on later though, maybe around 7 my time (6 yours)

  156. CT~J4C on 9 November 2009 at 15:44

    AND I’m starting to believe the syringe was used.

  157. CT~J4C on 9 November 2009 at 15:45

    She will rot forever

  158. CT~J4C on 9 November 2009 at 15:46

    I GTG. BBL

  159. stephanie on 9 November 2009 at 15:47

    I will CT…i have no doubts the syringe came from Casey, but I still believe she used it on Caylee. Casey doesn’t think that far in advance on anything, imo. I think when she threw Casey away she grabbed everything out of her trunk that went with it…except for TL’s trash because she was hoping that people would think that was what made her trunk smell.

  160. eyespy on 9 November 2009 at 15:51

    Steph
    I cant watch the tv…hubby has a butload of csi tivo’d, can you post anything good?

    Ct
    That was an awsome post today, lotta work in that one….

  161. humbleopinion on 9 November 2009 at 15:52

    Apparently this was updated today:

    http://www.wesh.com/news/21532034/detail.html

  162. eyespy on 9 November 2009 at 15:53

    That was quick, ok Ct see you later…

  163. eyespy on 9 November 2009 at 15:56

    Humble
    Is it only the duct tape that supports the DP? Am i reading that wrong..

  164. stephanie on 9 November 2009 at 15:57

    Thank you Humble…

    Eyes, I will but don’t know if anything will be good for a bit, JVM is next

  165. stephanie on 9 November 2009 at 15:58

    That is what I am reading Eyes and would agree

  166. stephanie on 9 November 2009 at 15:59
  167. humbleopinion on 9 November 2009 at 16:00

    No i think the syringe also supports the DP! As Hornsby (Mikkas :heart: ) says the syringe removes any reasonable doubt.

  168. Molly on 9 November 2009 at 16:29

    I listed to the radio show interview with Diane Fanning & LP today (it is posted on the previous blog).

    Fanning stated that Baez’s body guard slammed her up against a cement wall as she was trying to approach him. ! geesh
    Cindy was the only girl growing up & her brothers & family called her “the princess”. You can kinda see how she passed that down to casey in how she treated her & also how she always demands to get her own way.
    Most of her findings & observations are like all of ours as to the family dynamics & personalities. How they let casey get away with everything & how George wants to be honest but is overpowered by cindy.

    LP said that Tracy’s interview was not complete & that there is much more damning things said & he doesn’t even know exactly all of it.
    He has been offered to be flown to Australia to see the play & is a good possibility that he will take them up on it & go!
    He liked the book & all his peeps read it too & thought it was very well done.
    He was not sure about them getting the DP, but now after imagining caylee getting shot up with the chloroform toxic injection, a good chance they will get it.

To post on the Caylee case: Caylee
PLEASE post off topics on: OFF TOPIC