Chit Chat JVM and NG 23Nov09

23 November 2009 at 15:57
By

Chit Chat JVM and NG …………………………

Share on TwitterSubmit to StumbleUponSave on DeliciousDigg ThisShare via email

29 Responses to Chit Chat JVM and NG 23Nov09

  1. mikka on 23 November 2009 at 16:01

    1

  2. mikka on 23 November 2009 at 16:01

    a blogger from hornsby write this! :w00t:

    Mr. Hornsby. Do not attempt to correspond with me via my personal email again. Nor, address me by the “given name” I use on FaceBook. (Great, so you can sleuth! We know how you love goggle & Wiki!)

    If you’ve something to say to me, please, be professional (which I understand IS different from being [un]ethical), and do so through this comment section of your blog. That’s the point, right?

    How unprofessional for you to contact those who comment here through their email accounts, which they used to register here, in an attempt to intimidate, and dissuade them from disagreeing with you and your tactics.

    How many others have you contacted using the email addys provided here to register?

    Poor behavior and very inappropriate. *tsk tsk*

    If you wish to reply, do so on this blog. Do NOT email me again!

  3. Molly on 23 November 2009 at 16:03

    Hi mikka !

  4. mikka on 23 November 2009 at 16:04

    molly :lol:

  5. ss on 23 November 2009 at 16:11

    Oh my look what someone on hornsby’s blog said!

    Mr. Hornsby. Do not attempt to correspond with me via my personal email again. Nor, address me by the “given name” I use on FaceBook. (Great, so you can sleuth! We know how you love goggle & Wiki!)

    If you’ve something to say to me, please, be professional (which I understand IS different from being [un]ethical), and do so through this comment section of your blog. That’s the point, right?

    How unprofessional for you to contact those who comment here through their email accounts, which they used to register here, in an attempt to intimidate, and dissuade them from disagreeing with you and your tactics.

    How many others have you contacted using the email addys provided here to register?

    Poor behavior and very inappropriate. *tsk tsk*

    If you wish to reply, do so on this blog. Do NOT email me again!

  6. mikka on 23 November 2009 at 16:13

    So a competitor blasts WFTV-Channel 9 legal analyst Bill Sheaffer over his comments in the Casey Anthony case. She is charged with first-degree murder in the death of her daughter, Caylee.

    How does Sheaffer respond? Not by firing back or lambasting the critic by name, but by defending his actions.

    Attorney Richard Hornsby, who has done analysis for several stations, complained on his blog yesterday that Sheaffer was “taking gratuitous and false cheap shots at the Anthony defense” and that Sheaffer was guilty of “pro-prosecution pandering to the anti-Anthony sentiment.”

    Sheaffer sent me this comment this afternoon: “I have been asked for, and strive to, consistently deliver sound legal analysis of this case, based upon my knowledge and experience gained from 30 years as a criminal defense attorney and my time as a prosecutor. I am honored to share my insights with the viewers of WFTV Eyewitness News and enjoy the free exchange of ideas that result. It is, of course, always easier to criticize than to create, and it is easier to denigrate than to develop one’s own well-reasoned discourse on a topic. There will always be those who prefer to take that easier route. I think the public, the judicial system and the memory of Caylee are better served if the focus of the discussion remains on the facts of the case and the workings of our judicial system and not those who opine on these matters.”

    What do you make of the way Sheaffer responded?

  7. mikka on 23 November 2009 at 16:19

    bbl :w00t:

  8. ss on 23 November 2009 at 16:22

    Humble, can you please release my comment from moderation?

  9. mikka on 23 November 2009 at 16:27

    ss what is it????

  10. ss on 23 November 2009 at 16:28

    On hornsbys blog where you just posted scroll up a couple comments and see what hornsby did to someone

  11. mikka on 23 November 2009 at 16:36

    ss iahahhaahahhahhah i will copy the same here,and mine goes to moderation!hahahahhahahahahahahaha,
    great minds,steal the same! :lol: :lol: :lol:

  12. ss on 23 November 2009 at 16:38

    Mikka, I see why now it has the f/ book site in it

  13. ss on 23 November 2009 at 16:39

    Thats really sad he done that to her!

  14. ss on 23 November 2009 at 16:40

    Mikka, :w00t: :lol:

  15. ss on 23 November 2009 at 16:42

    BBL

  16. mikka on 23 November 2009 at 16:42

    ss may he like her! :lol: :w00t:

  17. mikka on 23 November 2009 at 16:43

    ss see ya bye! :wink:

  19. hvf on 23 November 2009 at 17:15

    Schaffer is my my guy
    Mikka
    You can have your Hornsby back. Yeah he may be good looking but I wondering if he has lost his mind. I prefer men with brains
    lol

  20. hvf on 23 November 2009 at 17:18

    oh yes and integrity

  21. Christine on 23 November 2009 at 17:24

    Hornsby stated that he isn’t paid for his legal commentaries when Bill Sheaffer is away from his desk…..

    WELL NOW WE KNOW EHY HE ISN’T PAID……..HE PRODUCES CRAPOLA, BLASTING A REAL LEGAL EAGLE…seems Hornsby may be a bit “green” around the edges.

    Give it up Hornsby and leave it to the EXPERTS……

  22. hvf on 23 November 2009 at 17:27

    oh yeah ………one more thing……..I LOVE suspenders!
    Maybe Hornsby can make a cheap shot at Larry King too. He is definetly Mr. Suspenders. I love Larry King and I love his suspenders.

  23. hvf on 23 November 2009 at 17:29

    Christine
    Maybe Hornsby’s face doesn’t look so handsome when it is the color GREEN

  24. gigwails on 23 November 2009 at 17:37

    Hi folks!

  25. hvf on 23 November 2009 at 17:38

    gigwalls!
    :smile:

  26. nannab on 23 November 2009 at 17:52

    :lol: Hornsby is getting it from all angles..

  27. hvf on 23 November 2009 at 17:55

    nannab
    what do you mean?

  28. hvf on 23 November 2009 at 18:19

    I just read a pole that ask if you believe Baez thinks casey is innocent. Only 2% believe Baez thinks she is innocent. Which means………..the gig is up. We all know that it is just for you to win. No one thinks you actually care about WF

To post on the Caylee case: Caylee
PLEASE post off topics on: OFF TOPIC