Chit Chat JVM and NG 10Dec09

10 December 2009 at 15:57
By

Chit chat JVM  and NG are on….

Even if you don’t watch JVM and/or NG you are welcome to join in the chat!

Share on TwitterSubmit to StumbleUponSave on DeliciousDigg ThisShare via email

183 Responses to Chit Chat JVM and NG 10Dec09

  1. eoar34 on 10 December 2009 at 16:00

    1st

  2. mikka on 10 December 2009 at 16:02

    eoar how are you??

  3. eoar34 on 10 December 2009 at 16:03

    I’m ok mikka, how bout you?

  4. mikka on 10 December 2009 at 16:03

    i am so nervos,when i think on tomorrow! :dizzy:

  5. mikka on 10 December 2009 at 16:04

    eoar i am o.k ,tired,lazy ,its cold! :w00t:

  6. eoar34 on 10 December 2009 at 16:04

    what time is the big shin dig?

  7. Molly on 10 December 2009 at 16:04

    o.k., gotta get up early tomorrow for this.
    mikka, set your alarm, it’s 6:30am for you isn’t it? ugh

    Hi steph!

  8. mikka on 10 December 2009 at 16:04

    eoar you are back to work yet??

  9. eoar34 on 10 December 2009 at 16:04

    cold here too Mikka, wind chill -9

  10. Molly on 10 December 2009 at 16:05

    Now I gotta get up at 9:00 for a pre show??????

  11. eoar34 on 10 December 2009 at 16:05

    no mikka, not yet, not until jan4th

  12. Stephanie on 10 December 2009 at 16:05

    Molly they did. But, her boss said that he was the one transferring her. He was training her for management positon. She was transferred to the office light duty because she brought a note from doctor(probably cindy). Than she went off had Caylee and only came back to the office once to show Caylee to them. Her boss had never seen Casey again. He said she was fired because of job abandonment. He also said in order to go to work for Universal when that all happened…you had to go to this seminar of something like this. He said Casey did NOT attend and wouldn’t have been able to work for Universal. But, in the docs it shows they fired her in April of 2006 or somewhere like that. Someone said maybe that was the official date because of what ever their regulations might be.

  13. mikka on 10 December 2009 at 16:05

    molly huh ,its early for me ! :w00t:

  14. eoar34 on 10 December 2009 at 16:05

    ok without wondering what planet i’ve been visiting, what exactly is going on tomorrow

  15. Molly on 10 December 2009 at 16:06

    Eoar – !!!! minus 9 where are you? I thought it was cold here.

  16. mikka on 10 December 2009 at 16:06

    eoar,thats good,relax a little bit more!

  17. mikka on 10 December 2009 at 16:06

    molly by me too,here is 13 f and its cold!

  18. eoar34 on 10 December 2009 at 16:07

    Molly I m in Ohio. temp is 13 with 40mph winds wind chill -9

  19. madmaxi on 10 December 2009 at 16:07

    wow eoar,, first!!! and you beat mikka??? I am amazed..I am going to go eat my fish dinner and maybe be back later,,, but, for sure I will be here in the morning for vinnie and the hearing… thanks humble.. :heart:

  20. Molly on 10 December 2009 at 16:08

    Thanks steph :smile:

    eoar – court appearance tomorrow. several motions.

  21. mikka on 10 December 2009 at 16:09

    she say on hln today,the prosecution subpoena teh anthonys and conwheel and not the defense,interesting!

  22. eoar34 on 10 December 2009 at 16:09

    thanks molly what time (florida time)

  23. mikka on 10 December 2009 at 16:09

    madi bye see ya!

  24. mikka on 10 December 2009 at 16:10

    eoar 9.30 florida time!

  25. eoar34 on 10 December 2009 at 16:10

    bye maxi, enjoy dinner

  26. Suzie Jane on 10 December 2009 at 16:10

    Eoar – TruTV tomorrow morning 9 am WF is live in court.

    Be there!

  27. eoar34 on 10 December 2009 at 16:10

    thanks Mikka

  28. Molly on 10 December 2009 at 16:10

    It was in the 30′s here today, but wicked cold winds. I don’t know what the wind chill was, but very cold!

  29. eoar34 on 10 December 2009 at 16:11

    no one will have it online?

  30. mikka on 10 December 2009 at 16:11

    suzie yes,this idiots on in session was talking pro bozo,he have no privacy in jail and bla,bla,bla!!

  31. mikka on 10 December 2009 at 16:12

    eoar,yes ,wesh,wftv,chanel 13 will have it!

  32. eoar34 on 10 December 2009 at 16:12

    again, thank you Mikka!

  33. Molly on 10 December 2009 at 16:12

    bye maxi

    mikka – the prosecution called them!! wow, I’m curious now what they’re going to ask them!

  34. Stephanie on 10 December 2009 at 16:14

    HEre is the interview of Casey’s boss

    http://humbleopinion.net76.net/interviews/mike%20kozak.pdf

  35. Molly on 10 December 2009 at 16:14

    I don’t understand what baez’s big deal is with being video’d. If nothing to hide, what is the big deal. What is he planning on doing?

  36. eoar34 on 10 December 2009 at 16:14

    niters all

  37. Molly on 10 December 2009 at 16:16

    g’nite eoar! see ya tomoorrow!

  38. mikka on 10 December 2009 at 16:16

    tomorrow is 1 year ago,she find caylee,will the anthonys tomorrow go back to the nice hotel and eat steak and crap! :angry:

  39. mikka on 10 December 2009 at 16:17

    molly ,i was thinking all teh time the defense called them,or hln had it wrong!

  40. maze on 10 December 2009 at 16:17

    darn i will still be sleeping when it starts…

  41. Molly on 10 December 2009 at 16:17

    mikka – If they’re gonna be on the stand by prosecution, I don’t think they’ll be celebrating!!! hahahahahahaha

  42. mikka on 10 December 2009 at 16:17

    eoar,nighty!

  43. madmaxi on 10 December 2009 at 16:18

    bye and love to you all,, mikka, eoar, molly , stephanie, humble, suzie jane,, and eastcoastdeb when she comes on board…. nite all… and justice for little caylee…

  44. mikka on 10 December 2009 at 16:18

    molly,geo will say i dont cant remember,cindy will chewing gum and smiling!!

  45. Molly on 10 December 2009 at 16:18

    I “assumed” it was the defense too!

  46. mikka on 10 December 2009 at 16:19

    maze,sleep is better than to watch this farce from the defense!

  47. mikka on 10 December 2009 at 16:19

    molly,we will see,but i am sure,no matter how,both will lie and conwheel too!

  48. Molly on 10 December 2009 at 16:20

    They better not get snotty on the stand! Stricky won’t like that.

  49. mikka on 10 December 2009 at 16:20

    madi gnight! see ya! :wink:

  50. mikka on 10 December 2009 at 16:21

    moly :lol: the last time stricky told geo ANSWER THAT QUESTION!! hahahahhhaha

  51. Molly on 10 December 2009 at 16:21

    This should be interesting with them. To see how they handle themselves & whatever questions they’re asked.

  52. maze on 10 December 2009 at 16:21

    hopefully I will be able to watch it somehwere after the fact

  53. Molly on 10 December 2009 at 16:22

    g’nite maxi! sleep well

    mikka – I remember that! They can NOT pull what they did in Morgan’s depo!!!

  54. humbleopinion on 10 December 2009 at 16:22
  55. Molly on 10 December 2009 at 16:23

    maze – when it’s over, they usually post it on utube pretty quickly.

  56. maze on 10 December 2009 at 16:25

    That is good to know molly

  57. maze on 10 December 2009 at 16:25

    we know what bozoz wants remeber that one pic????

  58. mikka on 10 December 2009 at 16:25

    humble thats dark curtains,in the new photos are dark curtains too,same appartment!

  59. maze on 10 December 2009 at 16:26

    wonder if geo and cindy saw that one..

  60. Molly on 10 December 2009 at 16:26

    someone in Miami puts up lots of Christmas lights, deco’s, etc.. $ 4,000.00 electric bill!!!!!!! they hire people to help them too!!

  61. maze on 10 December 2009 at 16:27

    jvm has caylee on

  62. Molly on 10 December 2009 at 16:27

    maze – I think you’re right about what he wants! lol :lol:

  63. maze on 10 December 2009 at 16:28

    already over now here comes tigggggggggggggggggerrrrrrrrrrr

  64. mikka on 10 December 2009 at 16:28

    maze i dont will watch jvm!!

  65. Molly on 10 December 2009 at 16:28

    Those dark circles under her eyes always bothered me

  66. maze on 10 December 2009 at 16:28

    shes good with her mouth “oopps”

  67. mikka on 10 December 2009 at 16:28

    maze HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHHAAHAHHAHAAHAH :lol:

  68. mikka on 10 December 2009 at 16:29

    molly,yes caylee dont had enough sleep!

  69. maze on 10 December 2009 at 16:29

    just channel surfing here Mikka I cannot stand either one anymore

  70. Molly on 10 December 2009 at 16:29

    I can’t watch jvm either. what did she say?

    oh tiger, tiger, tiger. wth
    He should just chck into rehab for sex addiction

  71. Suzie Jane on 10 December 2009 at 16:30

    #54 Thank you Humble. Don’t you agree this is probably just about the last day of Caylee’s life. This is at Tony’s, right?

    But she is not wearing the Trouble jammies….yet :-(

  72. mikka on 10 December 2009 at 16:31

    molly :lol:

    look this ugly biatches (mistresses)
    its time teh media leave him alone and move on!!

  73. mikka on 10 December 2009 at 16:32

    suzie,good call,no date from teh photos!but i am sure L.E know it,when this pictures are taken!

  74. Molly on 10 December 2009 at 16:32

    mikka – tiger story too juicy for them! and it just keeps growing with more women every day.

  75. Stephanie on 10 December 2009 at 16:33

    I don’t want to hear about Tiger. But, I do have to say this girl that is talking about feeling bad…than why did she go public??

  76. Molly on 10 December 2009 at 16:34

    I agree steph, why go public?

  77. maze on 10 December 2009 at 16:34

    I love how they call them mistresses lol,and I heard Elin is staying… what a fool

  78. Stephanie on 10 December 2009 at 16:35

    I found them…Yes Here is the records from Kodak/Universal

    http://www.docstoc.com/docs/7141704/Casey-Anthony-Universal-Studio-released-12-june-2009

  79. maze on 10 December 2009 at 16:35

    no wonder he plays golf he likes getting his balls in the hole..ahahhahhah

  80. mikka on 10 December 2009 at 16:36

    steph,she is a home wrecker and is money hungry!!

  81. Molly on 10 December 2009 at 16:36

    maze – she is!! $$$$ talks

  82. ScRaMa on 10 December 2009 at 16:36

    GE Mikka, Molly, Maze, Steph & whoever hasn’t left for good night’s sleep before the big hearing in the morn..
    I can’t stay just popin’ in to comment on the wage statement..
    wssn’t one of her school chums [brain f--t, can't think who now, duh] babysitting Caylee for a few months then told KC she no longer felt it right to when she found out KC was actually going out partying with friends & not really working.. whenever that was is when Casey was not working& thereafter! btw.. anyone can print out an old statement then write in anything to print out again.. I’ve done this with old logic problems to redo so it’s simple.. if KC did this she did this hurriedly w/o thought of doing the math, therefore maybe getting the wrong dates in there?? at this point who knows.. this whole case leaves one’s head spining again & aghain..
    Humble.. have you check’d u’r email?
    Mikki & Steph- miss you both.. hugs
    see ya tomorrow :kissing:

  83. Stephanie on 10 December 2009 at 16:36

    Molly…If she really felt bad for Elin she would NEVER have gone public. Nobody would have known and if she felt Elin should know…she could have contacted her instead of through the media. They all want the money and attention, imo.

  84. mikka on 10 December 2009 at 16:37

    maze hahahaahhahahhaha :blush:

  85. mikka on 10 December 2009 at 16:37

    scrama :smile:

  86. mikka on 10 December 2009 at 16:38

    steph,i agree with you,she is a naive ,stupid,dumm idiot girl!

  87. Stephanie on 10 December 2009 at 16:38

    Mikka…I totally agree about these sl*ts

    Hi Scrama…Been missing you
    Casey’s friend did sit and found out she wasn’t even working. Don’t know that she was partying but she wasn’t working. The Grunds never found that out as far as I know…they also sat

  88. mikka on 10 December 2009 at 16:38

    scrama see ya tomorrow :kissing:

  89. Stephanie on 10 December 2009 at 16:40

    I agree Mikka except I don’t know how naive she is. I think maybe she was when it came to Tiger, but she isn’t when it comes to the media….she is playing it up. I would be too ashamed and would be hiding my face and praying nobody ever found out about me.

  90. Stephanie on 10 December 2009 at 16:40

    By Scrama…I won’t be here for the hearing. But, i hope to see you after that

  91. mikka on 10 December 2009 at 16:42

    must cook now,see ya later :wink:

  92. Stephanie on 10 December 2009 at 16:44

    Casey was hired in June of 2004 as a full time employee…she would get maternity leave.

  93. Stephanie on 10 December 2009 at 16:44

    Bye Mikka…I am going to cook something too.

  94. Molly on 10 December 2009 at 16:45

    me too, stomach grumbling
    see ya all tomorrow! we’ll have much to talk about!

  95. Suzie Jane on 10 December 2009 at 16:50

    #78 Steph – who is Michael Hamilton in these docs? :eek:

  96. Stephanie on 10 December 2009 at 16:54

    I don’t know Suzie…I only know Mike Kozak the boss of Casey. But if you go down in the doc you will see when Casey was hired and when she was terminated. Also i was reading Jeffery’s and he was a part time and moved around…his info said he was a casual worker. Where as Casey’s says regular…this is why I don’t think she was moved around, but it still doesn’t make sense to me.

  97. smoke&mirrors on 10 December 2009 at 16:58

    Hi Everyone,

    Casey’s Fantasy World – Michael Hamilton:
    Michael Hamilton – Universal Studios management. Here is the fake e-mail address created by Casey: (mike.hamilton @ yahoo.com)

    “Real” Mike Hamilton

    Mike D. Hamilton – worked for Finnegan’s Bar & Grill in Universal (6/2004 – 10/2004)
    Mike P. Hamilton – worked for Island of Adventure (7/2004 – 4/2007)
    Mike J. Hamilton – worked for Hard Rock Corp. (2/1998 – 10/1999)

  98. Stephanie on 10 December 2009 at 16:58

    Suzie…where are you seeing Michael Hamilton?

  99. Stephanie on 10 December 2009 at 16:59

    Thank you Smoke…i was really confused, lol

  100. smoke&mirrors on 10 December 2009 at 17:00

    YW Stephanie! :smile:

  101. Stephanie on 10 December 2009 at 17:00

    Smoke…This is the first time I noticed on those employment records…If Casey was moved around where needed she would have been called a casual worker. I got that from Jeffrey’s employment record, lol

  102. Stephanie on 10 December 2009 at 17:02

    They just mentioned Billy Joel on the station I am watching…Yesterday I recorded the 25 anniversary of rock and roll hall of fame…it is sooooo good.

  103. Suzie Jane on 10 December 2009 at 17:02

    Steph, something just seems so off. Kodak/Universal should have much more professional-looking paperwork and I just can’t ditch the feeling that it is counterfeit – and WHY??

    Now I’m obsessing :lol: Nite nite for court tomorrow :yawn:

  104. smoke&mirrors on 10 December 2009 at 17:02

    I believe Jeff was only working P/T in his junior year of high school.

  105. Stephanie on 10 December 2009 at 17:04

    Night Suzie…This info was coming to them from someone at Universal…

  106. Stephanie on 10 December 2009 at 17:05

    He was only working part time. But, if Casey was moved around she would not have been a regular employee…she would have been concerted a casual employee…at least I would think they would.

  107. Stephanie on 10 December 2009 at 17:06

    I just don’t see how her boss that told them she abandoned her job wouldn’t have been informed that she was moved to a different department…that makes no sense.

  108. Stephanie on 10 December 2009 at 17:07

    It also makes no sense that she was payed for so long afterwards…Even Lauren discovered she wasn’t working and quit watching Caylee. Someone said long ago maybe they had to wait a certain amount of time before terminating….But, than why pay her?

  109. smoke&mirrors on 10 December 2009 at 17:08

    Delores Crawford (aka: Dee) – Director, HR at EVENT IMAGING SOLUTIONS GROUP (a Kodak co.) verified Casey’s employment record as 6/24/04 – 11/26/05.

  110. smoke&mirrors on 10 December 2009 at 17:08

    Casey’s “Customer History Report” at AMSCOT – Application to cash checks completed and signed 11/15/2005
    • Name of Spouse: Jesse G.
    • Name of Relative: – Cynthia M. Anthony with a bogus ph. # (407) 808-5172
    • [this phone # is one digit diff. from Lee’s cell phone #]
    • Payroll Checks Cashed at AMSCOT
    • Event Imaging Solutions – 12/23/05 (chk date)
    • Ceridian 12/30/05, 1/13/06, 2/10/06, 2/24/06, & 3/10/06 (chk dates)

  111. Suzie Jane on 10 December 2009 at 17:11

    Oh Gawd Steph – I can’t stay away! Hi S&M!

    How can we find out how WF held that job thru 9 months of pregnancy and post partum and still got paid like that? Huh?

    And why on earth would she abandon a job like that with a newborn? Newborns take $$

    Maybe the escort position opened up…. :lol:

  112. eoar34 on 10 December 2009 at 17:12

    steph, are you still here

  113. smoke&mirrors on 10 December 2009 at 17:13

    ColorVision bought out Event Imaging in 2006. I believe it was April 2006. This is the company Mike Kozak was referring to when he spoke about the transfer to the new company. Casey did not transfer.

    It is possible that Casey went to another sub-contractor company [name unknown] after leaving Event Imaging and they also assigned her to work on-site at Universal.

  114. Suzie Jane on 10 December 2009 at 17:13

    Wow Smoke – you are excellent!

    Who is Ceridian???

  115. smoke&mirrors on 10 December 2009 at 17:14

    Hi Suzie & Eoar! :smile:

  116. smoke&mirrors on 10 December 2009 at 17:16

    Ceridian is an HR services company that many companies outsource to, especially to handle payroll.

  117. Stephanie on 10 December 2009 at 17:18

    I am here Eoar..

    Smoke..Do you think those late pay dates could be making up for Maternity leave?

  118. Suzie Jane on 10 December 2009 at 17:19

    Thanx Smoke! Makes sense. Nothing else in this case does though.

  119. eoar34 on 10 December 2009 at 17:19

    steph you have mail

  120. smoke&mirrors on 10 December 2009 at 17:20

    Caylee was born 9 August 2005. We do not have enough history to show how long Casey took off for Maternity Leave.

  121. Stephanie on 10 December 2009 at 17:21

    I just can’t see her going somewhere else and working…I really think once she didn’t work she really enjoyed that. She did work for a little over a year at Kodak…Plus he was going to train her for management position…This would be more money. Why wouldn’t she go back instead of starting all over. Plus those months she is getting paid…Lauren also discovered she didn’t work and wouldn’t sit anymore. None of it makes any sense at all. Unless it was a part of the maternity leave she did’t get

  122. Stephanie on 10 December 2009 at 17:21

    No Eoar…You do, lol

  123. smoke&mirrors on 10 December 2009 at 17:22

    Suzie,

    We are all still trying to put together the pieces of the puzzle. Too often tough we do not have all of the pieces or the Ants have miscontrued the truth so badly, it leaves us scratching our heads! :lol:

  124. eoar34 on 10 December 2009 at 17:24

    ah, i think its your turn Steph

  125. Stephanie on 10 December 2009 at 17:25

    Smoke…Do you mean Kodak/Imagining Solutions hired her out as a sub contractor?

  126. smoke&mirrors on 10 December 2009 at 17:26

    Lauren Gibbs stopped babysitting for Casey in April 2006 when Caylee was about 8 mos. old. Casey told her she was working at the Sports Authority at that time. Lauren said Casey lied to her about that.

    I am not going to rack my brain about what Casey was being paid for and when. Based on what we do know it appears Casey’s last time worked ocurred within the same time period as when Lauren stopped keeping Caylee.

  127. smoke&mirrors on 10 December 2009 at 17:27

    Event Imaging Solutions was a sub-contract company for Universal.

  128. Stephanie on 10 December 2009 at 17:27

    Your turn Eoar, lol

  129. eoar34 on 10 December 2009 at 17:28

    lol

  130. Suzie Jane on 10 December 2009 at 17:29

    Smoke, I’m gonna have to start wearing a helmet!!! These people drive me nuts.

    I can’t wait for my WF saga fix in the morning. And this time, I’m really going :lol: Love ya XOXO

  131. Stephanie on 10 December 2009 at 17:30

    I still think something is wrong with it…If her boss was having her fired for abandonment of job…why would they put her somewhere else and/or not mention any of it to him?
    Plus why would she say she was working for Sports Authority if she had a real job? None of it makes sense…like I said earlier about the graduation code on her transcript and she didn’t graduate.

  132. smoke&mirrors on 10 December 2009 at 17:31

    :lol: Suzie

  133. eoar34 on 10 December 2009 at 17:31

    your turn, thanks steph!!!!

  134. smoke&mirrors on 10 December 2009 at 17:34

    Steph have you ever been with a company during a merger? I got the sense from Miike Kozak’s interview that he was speculating about Casey being fired for job abandonment. He may have simply lost track of her once she did not transfer to the new company, ColorVision. IDK

  135. smoke&mirrors on 10 December 2009 at 17:35

    These paychecks certainly suggest Casey was working:

    Ceridian 12/30/05, 1/13/06, 2/10/06, 2/24/06, & 3/10/06 (chk dates)

  136. ScRaMa on 10 December 2009 at 17:35

    like Suzie, I couldn’t stay away..
    S&M.. I thought so, that was the same timeframe Casey stopped working! thanks! And, Steph, yesss I remember now, it was Lauren who babysat her then! big Scrama hugs to you both! I wish i had more time to do all the “homework” you two do! I will sit here for awhile tho eating late dinner..
    hey, Eoar & Steph, I want email too.. lol :wink:

  137. smoke&mirrors on 10 December 2009 at 17:37

    Hi ScRaMa,

    Good to see ya! :smile:

  138. Suzie Jane on 10 December 2009 at 17:37

    Steph I totally agree. (Every time I try to sign off, I can’t!)

    What is the purpose behind this payroll thing? What are they trying to hide/distort here with this document? I’m with you it deserves further investigation by some one?????

  139. ScRaMa on 10 December 2009 at 17:37

    oh, you too S&M.. always good to see you at your best.. doing all that work! :kissing:

  140. eoar34 on 10 December 2009 at 17:39

    did NG just admit shes a eeyore? lol

  141. eastcoastdeb on 10 December 2009 at 17:39

    HI everyone. I heard on JVM that the Anthonys are subpoened in relationship to Dominic Casey. Sounds like fun.

  142. ScRaMa on 10 December 2009 at 17:40

    a what, eoar?? lol

  143. Stephanie on 10 December 2009 at 17:40

    I have been with my x through 2 mergers. Idk…I think Mike was taking her under his wing and also thought she could do more…that is why he wanted to train her into management. She could have been working…It has been a while since I have been around large companies. But, I don’t remember anyone that lost track of a person like that…Maybe Mike shouldn’t be in the position he is.

    I am going to read his interview again

  144. smoke&mirrors on 10 December 2009 at 17:41

    Suzie,

    Anymore it is very commonplace for companies to reduce the cost of processing payroll by outsourcing it to companies like Ceridian, Paychex and others. It just makes good business sense. Ceridian is only the name of the company that issued Casey’s paychecks in the 1st Qrtr. of 2006, but it is not the name of the company she was working for. We do not have the name of that company or if we do I missed it.

  145. Stephanie on 10 December 2009 at 17:41

    Hi again Scrama…Hugs back to you

    Hi East…I am hoping to catch some of it. I really want to see Cindy on the stand and how she acts. I also want to see Casey’s reaction to Cindy.

  146. eoar34 on 10 December 2009 at 17:42

    she said ” I am a jack*zz” she really said tiger should admit that, but i thought it was funny she said it lol

  147. eastcoastdeb on 10 December 2009 at 17:44

    Me too Steph. I really hope they put her in her place. I want her ‘grinch face’ publicized all over the place again.
    Eoar, I think someone should grab that Tiger by the tail and dismember it.

  148. smoke&mirrors on 10 December 2009 at 17:44

    Hi eastcoastdeb! :smile:

  149. eastcoastdeb on 10 December 2009 at 17:45

    Hi Smoke. :smile: Are you all ready for the trial tomorrow?

  150. ScRaMa on 10 December 2009 at 17:46

    how many of us woman have worked up until our babies were born then were put on termination & got paid for it after our babies were born. I know I worked a long time before & after all my kids but never paid much at all when off & I went back w/in a week after each child. guess it depends on what our job was.. mine, was a desk so not bad but still did a lot of walking around for others.. I am completely baffled as to her actually duties & still question she even made but mere monies.. why would anyone hire someone in this position without a hs dipoloma anyway, it doesn’t click with me!
    oh well, back to my dinner.. on the side

  151. eastcoastdeb on 10 December 2009 at 17:48

    Scrama,Casey’s only ‘duty’ was walking around Orlando with a mattress on her back.

  152. Stephanie on 10 December 2009 at 17:49

    Mike must be wrong, but I don’t think he is about the abandonment…it shows the last day she worked there was April 23 rd but her last check in March 10th.

  153. Stephanie on 10 December 2009 at 17:50

    My mom lied about how far along she was to continue working…I don’t know that she had maternity leave, but went back to the same office afterwards.

  154. humbleopinion on 10 December 2009 at 17:51

    Hi everyone, on for just a minute. I know when I worked, we had a Family and Medical Leave Act, and the woman got paid for baby leave. Of course not all company’s have it in there, but it is becoming a bog thing.

  155. smoke&mirrors on 10 December 2009 at 17:51

    eastcoastdeb,

    After my last experience, I promised myself I would not do that again. Due to the buffering I missed that all important argument Baez made to Judge Strickland about members of his duhfense team being “technically challenged.”

    That was the reason Judge Strickland reversed his own decision about the release of the autopsy photos. That said, I will wait until at least 1 or 2 hours before viewing the hearing tomorrow.

    So, I’ll read comments form others on the blog before I invest time in watching the video.

  156. smoke&mirrors on 10 December 2009 at 17:53

    Hi Humble :smile:

  157. eoar34 on 10 December 2009 at 17:53

    humble, thats the law now FMLA is nation wide and the law

  158. Stephanie on 10 December 2009 at 17:54

    There are many companies now that also give a maternity leave to the father

  159. Stephanie on 10 December 2009 at 17:55

    Hi Humble…how are you?

  160. eoar34 on 10 December 2009 at 17:55

    that is the law too Steph paternity leave is part of FMLA

  161. humbleopinion on 10 December 2009 at 17:55

    I think she lied on her application for work. Of course if the question is asked, did you graduate, she would say yes. IF they would have checked they would have figure out she didn’t. Also Universal is just like Seal world here, they hire the kids.

  162. smoke&mirrors on 10 December 2009 at 17:56

    FMLA only guarantees time off without lose of job. It is at a no pay status unless you have sick, vacation or other personal leave paid time to clock off with the FMLA. When out of all paid time, it is at a NO PAY status.

  163. humbleopinion on 10 December 2009 at 17:57

    Hi ya Smoke, Eoar, Steph, ECDeb ScRaMa and any one I missed!

  164. eoar34 on 10 December 2009 at 17:57

    exactly right smoke, thanks

  165. eastcoastdeb on 10 December 2009 at 17:57

    Good idea Smoke and far easier on the nerves. LOL

  166. Stephanie on 10 December 2009 at 17:57

    Eoar…so it is in law for men too? That is good

  167. Suzie Jane on 10 December 2009 at 17:58

    First of all #136 Sorry Scrama – it was you :love: Can’t stay away!

    OK back to Ceridian. Apparently, WF no longer worked for EIS with these 2006 paycheck activities at AMSCOT. A company like Kodak would never hire outside payroll companies. Part of being a big company is that all that confidential info stays in house.

    So who was she working for??? I smell fish…

  168. humbleopinion on 10 December 2009 at 17:58

    Smoke, when reading up on it, the company can choose how they work it! There are requirements set forth by the company. The company I worked for paid employees..

  169. smoke&mirrors on 10 December 2009 at 18:00

    I think it is wonderful for men to share in the responsiblity of caring for the children, so it makes a lot of sense to have this benefit apply to anyone who has primary care responsiblities. We’ve come a long ways baby! Woo hoo!

  170. ScRaMa on 10 December 2009 at 18:00

    GE, Humble..
    some here were lucky getting paid for time off, not so lucky here to have that when I was having my babies [huhhummmm] .. just lucky to have a good job to go back to with a few days pay off. They called it termination back then too as if you were fired! I hated that word & actually had to call after my first baby was born to ask if I still had a job & they said yes but that was just a term they used! duh!

  171. Stephanie on 10 December 2009 at 18:01

    Casey can lie about graduating…remember for some reason her transcripts say she graduated. I sure wish we knew if she somehow had that copy or if it was computer generated…that still bothers me, lol

  172. Stephanie on 10 December 2009 at 18:03

    Scrama…I bet that is what my mom did..

  173. smoke&mirrors on 10 December 2009 at 18:04

    Humble, unless you got that directly from someone in HR it is not necessarily a given that the pay was not coming from other personel paid time earned. All most ppl. who get paid care about is that they are getting paid.

  174. ScRaMa on 10 December 2009 at 18:04

    lol Steph, are you calling me “old” ?? j/k hug

  175. Stephanie on 10 December 2009 at 18:05

    Never Scrama…I still feel like I am in my twenties and I know you are only about 27

  176. Stephanie on 10 December 2009 at 18:06

    Scrama…how far along would you have to be before they made you take off from work?

  177. humbleopinion on 10 December 2009 at 18:07

    Your right Smoke, the policy at the company I worked for gave it to them. It was in their policy. NOT all company’s do that.

    The military also give the service member 2 weeks off after the baby is born. That is new, and hasn’t been around long.

  178. smoke&mirrors on 10 December 2009 at 18:11

    Yeah Humble, the military is all about taking care of the family. And rightly so! :smile:

    It does not surprise me tough that some companies are finding better ways to make it work in support of Work/Family life goals. As long as their practices are uniformly administered and not with only a select few, those companies that have taken this federal law (FMLA) to a new level are to be commended!

  179. humbleopinion on 10 December 2009 at 18:12

    What the heck, I am 29…am I the oldest one here?

  180. ScRaMa on 10 December 2009 at 18:13

    Steph, with my first, I worked up until he was born, He was my premmie! the others, well, I’d really have to go way back there so can’t remember back that far
    I jsut remember the first by then I knew termination meant I still had a job to go back to
    and, yes.. I am only 27. thank you very much! :wink:

  181. Stephanie on 10 December 2009 at 18:17
  182. Stephanie on 10 December 2009 at 18:18

    Scrama… :smile:

To post on the Caylee case: Caylee
PLEASE post off topics on: OFF TOPIC