humble ……since they did not file a motion last night and the due date has come and gone can theynstill do it on Monday? And if so can they do it during the up coming hearing?
Back in January when Todd Macaluso stated in court that the defense had proof that someone else put Caylee’s body in the woods WHILE Casey was in jail, Judge Strickland responded that if the defense had such proof that information should be presented to the court, and I believe gave a deadline for this to happen, somewhere around the beginning of February.
Well, what happened? Did Judge Strickland ever follow up on this and tell them that it was time to furnish the information? The defense, via Macaluso, introduced a bomb which obviously was nonsense. This to me should be criminal since we, the public, are so invested in justice for this little girl. If someone says that they have proof someone else did it, they should have to answer to those claims or be held accountable for…perjury?
Can representatives speaking on behalf of a defendant be charged with perjury just as the defendant as their own witness can?
Hi ya Glen, we are not sure the date has come and gone. They may have until 7 April to file it! The 7th is 15 working days from the last hearing! So I am not sure when the date is.
Hi ya Linda, like everything else the d-team has done, 1 February was the deadline. Of course they presented NOTHING. If they have proof that Casey didn’t put Caylee there, doesn’t mean she didn’t kill her, also LE would have to start looking into Cindy, as she would have been the only one who could move the body and keep it quiet!
humble i read your last comment on the last post about your son…you shold be very proud of your son, most young men don’t reconize the signs. you did a great job raising him and you should give yourself a big hug
I am not sure they can be charged, especially if they are going off what the “leader” Queen bee is saying. If it can prove that it is a lie, it is different! But I have a feeling proving what they say or said could be hard to do! There is client/attorney privacy acts!
Hi Glen, thanks! He bought me the book that Fanning put out, even though he knew I didn’t want it! lol He is a good guy! Very kind hearted! Even hates when we kill bugs!
I was going thru some of Caylee’s pics she had such doey eyes, they were beautiful. her eyes grab me so much..they also look so sad :(:(:( i cann’t stand it.
HI GLEN HUMBLE AND LINDA I WAS READING SOMETHING CUTE ABOUT POSSIABLE BOOK TITALS.ITS SO FUNNY ANOTHER CONTEST WOULD BE LET ME COUNT THE TRUTHS COMING OUT OF ALL OF THEM INCLUDING THERE FRIENDS.BET IT WOULD BE A VERY SHORT LIST.YA THINK?
i ALSO THINK SHE LOOKED SO SAD AND PROBABLY WHEN SHE HAD A HUGE SMILE ON SHE WAS INSTRUCTED TO BY CINDY.IT WAS SO SELFISH TO HIDE HER FATER FROM CAYLEE IT WOULD HAVE EFFECTED HER LATER IN HER LIFE IF CASEY WOULD HAVE LET HER LIVE.SHE PROBABLY DIDNT KNOW HOW SAD.HUGS ALL
Another concern of mine is how much of a potential is it for the defense to get some advantages like the Change of Venue?
Another poster recently stated that the more people keep bashing Casey, the Anthonys and the Defense, the more cause they have to have the case reassigned to another area for trial, in which case Judge Strickland, who has been open with his thoughts, would not preside.
I still recall at the sentencing for Casey’s Check Fraud case, Judge Strickland made a comment that I am surprised didn’t hit the media hard. He was explaining his reasoning behind his sentencing to her guilty pleas and said that regarding her Murder trial, if the State is correct, then Ms. Anthony would be facing a long-term incarceration, and then went on to say, “Or what’s worse…if the Defense is correct…”, then she would be freed.
I know there may be more than one way to interpret this comment, but my hunch was that Judge Strickland entertained the possibility that despite her guilt, she may win at trial due to any number of reasons, a lack of direct evidence, or one of those technicalities that could result in a dismissal.
I have seen Judge Strickland working hard to ensure a fair trial so that these potentials can be avoided, in addition to creating a sound process that would be difficult on appeal, but I still wonder about these potentials. Are any of these scenarios real threats against the justice we all seek?
Chit chat is on……………………
any one here?
humble ……since they did not file a motion last night and the due date has come and gone can theynstill do it on Monday? And if so can they do it during the up coming hearing?
Hi,
Back in January when Todd Macaluso stated in court that the defense had proof that someone else put Caylee’s body in the woods WHILE Casey was in jail, Judge Strickland responded that if the defense had such proof that information should be presented to the court, and I believe gave a deadline for this to happen, somewhere around the beginning of February.
Well, what happened? Did Judge Strickland ever follow up on this and tell them that it was time to furnish the information? The defense, via Macaluso, introduced a bomb which obviously was nonsense. This to me should be criminal since we, the public, are so invested in justice for this little girl. If someone says that they have proof someone else did it, they should have to answer to those claims or be held accountable for…perjury?
Can representatives speaking on behalf of a defendant be charged with perjury just as the defendant as their own witness can?
Hi ya Glen, we are not sure the date has come and gone. They may have until 7 April to file it! The 7th is 15 working days from the last hearing! So I am not sure when the date is.
Hi ya Linda, like everything else the d-team has done, 1 February was the deadline. Of course they presented NOTHING. If they have proof that Casey didn’t put Caylee there, doesn’t mean she didn’t kill her, also LE would have to start looking into Cindy, as she would have been the only one who could move the body and keep it quiet!
Thanks humble
linda I believe they can be held accounable, theytake an oth to up hold the law,lieing is not the truth…
what do you think HUMBLE
humble i read your last comment on the last post about your son…you shold be very proud of your son, most young men don’t reconize the signs. you did a great job raising him and you should give yourself a big hug
I am not sure they can be charged, especially if they are going off what the “leader” Queen bee is saying. If it can prove that it is a lie, it is different! But I have a feeling proving what they say or said could be hard to do! There is client/attorney privacy acts!
Hi Glen, thanks! He bought me the book that Fanning put out, even though he knew I didn’t want it! lol He is a good guy! Very kind hearted! Even hates when we kill bugs!
humble..take a bow you deserve it.
I was going thru some of Caylee’s pics she had such doey eyes, they were beautiful. her eyes grab me so much..they also look so sad :(:(:( i cann’t stand it.
but justic is coming
HI GLEN HUMBLE AND LINDA I WAS READING SOMETHING CUTE ABOUT POSSIABLE BOOK TITALS.ITS SO FUNNY ANOTHER CONTEST WOULD BE LET ME COUNT THE TRUTHS COMING OUT OF ALL OF THEM INCLUDING THERE FRIENDS.BET IT WOULD BE A VERY SHORT LIST.YA THINK?
i ALSO THINK SHE LOOKED SO SAD AND PROBABLY WHEN SHE HAD A HUGE SMILE ON SHE WAS INSTRUCTED TO BY CINDY.IT WAS SO SELFISH TO HIDE HER FATER FROM CAYLEE IT WOULD HAVE EFFECTED HER LATER IN HER LIFE IF CASEY WOULD HAVE LET HER LIVE.SHE PROBABLY DIDNT KNOW HOW SAD.HUGS ALL
Another concern of mine is how much of a potential is it for the defense to get some advantages like the Change of Venue?
Another poster recently stated that the more people keep bashing Casey, the Anthonys and the Defense, the more cause they have to have the case reassigned to another area for trial, in which case Judge Strickland, who has been open with his thoughts, would not preside.
I still recall at the sentencing for Casey’s Check Fraud case, Judge Strickland made a comment that I am surprised didn’t hit the media hard. He was explaining his reasoning behind his sentencing to her guilty pleas and said that regarding her Murder trial, if the State is correct, then Ms. Anthony would be facing a long-term incarceration, and then went on to say, “Or what’s worse…if the Defense is correct…”, then she would be freed.
I know there may be more than one way to interpret this comment, but my hunch was that Judge Strickland entertained the possibility that despite her guilt, she may win at trial due to any number of reasons, a lack of direct evidence, or one of those technicalities that could result in a dismissal.
I have seen Judge Strickland working hard to ensure a fair trial so that these potentials can be avoided, in addition to creating a sound process that would be difficult on appeal, but I still wonder about these potentials. Are any of these scenarios real threats against the justice we all seek?
new bloggie
http://humbleopinionforum.net/2010/04/02/recap-baez-depos-casey-snack-fund-kathi-belich-questions-03april2009/#comment-51738
JAH and Linda,
Answered you on the new post:
http://humbleopinionforum.net/2010/04/02/recap-baez-depos-casey-snack-fund-kathi-belich-questions-03april2009/