Casey Anthony update 21May2010

21 May 2010 at 17:30
By

Well another doc dump, and some more repeats.  Read the file:  WFTV.com

Just when you thought you heard and read everything, reading this document, makes you go hmmm!





Yep, according to Cindy, these were at the Nanny’s house! hmmm!

Yep you can read it in the documents. These must have been claims that the liar brat jail Muffin had told her so called mother, who in turn told LE. Unbelievable? Cindy also stated that the baby bag was used by Casey and the unfound Nanny!

Share on TwitterSubmit to StumbleUponSave on DeliciousDigg ThisShare via email

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

45 Responses to Casey Anthony update 21May2010

  1. jojo21 on 21 May 2010 at 17:41

    Whoa!! You mean I can say …..#1????? Where is Mikka??

  2. jojo21 on 21 May 2010 at 17:42

    …or anyone else, as far as that goes?

  3. jojo21 on 21 May 2010 at 17:44

    eeeeee….this is fun……….

  4. jojo21 on 21 May 2010 at 17:45

    I still say the state has this case wrapped up in their pockets….Thank Heavens!! …and I truly hope they go after the Anthony’s after this is over with all their cover up and lies!!

  5. mikka on 21 May 2010 at 18:00

    jojo,numero uno! :lol:
    how are you??

  6. jojo21 on 21 May 2010 at 18:08

    …Hi Mikka………..good to see you here…………..

  7. jojo21 on 21 May 2010 at 18:09

    by the way……..thank you and Humble and Smokes and all for their input about the Anthony’s….

  8. jojo21 on 21 May 2010 at 18:11

    I sure hope Judge Perry puts a “stop” to all of this nonsense with the defense………and their “whining” and “stalling”…..it is sooooooo tiresome…..

  9. Carol on 21 May 2010 at 18:14

    Good Evening All. Hi jojo21 and mikka! jojo21, I was first ONCE also. Mikka was busy getting a cup of coffee. You have to know how to sneak in here.
    Cindy, how’s your headache? How’s your life going? She’s sitting there wondering how to cover up the old lies with new ones!

  10. Carol on 21 May 2010 at 18:16

    I bet bozo has a headache tonight too! Oh, don’t worry, J Berry is going to shut this circus down in a hurry.

  11. Carol on 21 May 2010 at 18:19

    Now, tell me about this inflatable mattress bed that was in the car. Cindy bought it for Casey to do what with? I know it was supposed to be for Caylee, but come on now, really?

  12. jojo21 on 21 May 2010 at 18:19

    Carol…..thanks for making me smile about being #1………and yes, I can’t wait for Judge Perry to put a STOP to all this nonsense………….

  13. Carol on 21 May 2010 at 18:29

    jojo, the next hearing is June 1. But princess horse face doesn’t have to be there. It’s like skip day for her. She can sleep late, read, snack and do her nails. Oh, that’s right, she gets to do that every day! Silly me!

  14. jojo21 on 21 May 2010 at 18:40

    I have a feeling that when this case finally goes to trial……..and a verdict is announced……..GUILTY!! all of our computers may blow a fuse!!!!

  15. Carol on 21 May 2010 at 18:42

    Cindy is going to be a stellar witness again with the Zenaida hearing. HA! Do we know when that is? They are going to have to give her a bucket of sedatives! She can pull that long hair out instead of going to a beautician.

  16. Carol on 21 May 2010 at 18:43

    The astronauts will hear us yelling!!! :biggrin:

  17. Carol on 21 May 2010 at 18:45

    WE should all meet at Fusion and party that day! :w00t:

  18. Carol on 21 May 2010 at 18:46

    Where’s my little happy icon? Rats! :sad:

  19. jojo21 on 21 May 2010 at 18:47

    Carol……….I am laughing…….I don’t know how to do the faces………

  20. Carol on 21 May 2010 at 18:55

    Well, I want my money back! So, jojo, did you read all the docs today?

  21. Carol on 21 May 2010 at 18:57

    Looks like you and I are the last dogs standing here.
    I read ‘em and then pushed my eye balls back in my sockets and sat in a dark room for awhile. Alot of reruns though.

  22. Carol on 21 May 2010 at 19:06

    Double RATS! Now, I’m in moderation. Well, jojo, it was nice talking to you. I guess I have to come back another time.

  23. Carol on 21 May 2010 at 19:39

    ((((((((Helllllooooo)))))))I guess I am the last dog standing.

  24. quarterhorse_trainer on 21 May 2010 at 19:43

    I thought that old Zenida stuff had gone bye bye/ Guess they’re going to play that card again. Is the new doc dump worth going through? or just a repeat of what we’ve seen already? :lol:

  25. Marsha on 21 May 2010 at 19:51

    grrrrrrr…anyone watchin Dateline? Storming here and that channel went blank. I’m gonna go WF (as opposed to postal) if it doesn’t come back soon!

  26. Colhere on 21 May 2010 at 20:27

    hehe.. third sentence of the second paragraph of small print..

    “.. that belong to one of her many boyfriends”..

    hehe..

  27. Suzie Jane on 21 May 2010 at 20:38

    Oh Geez Marsha – “gonna go WF” hahahahahahahahaha :lol:

  28. Suzie Jane on 21 May 2010 at 20:40

    Quarter – IMO the dump today is not worth the wear and tear on your eyeballs.

  29. smoke&mirrors on 21 May 2010 at 20:54

    The top post relates to this event:

    THU, August 7, 2008 – Armed with a search warrant, a team of forensic investigators show up at the Anthony family home and removed several articles of clothing . Cindy said these items had been in Casey’s car. They collected three pairs of pants, six shirts and two skirts from a closet in Casey Anthony’s room. Some of them have been washed by Cindy because they had a foul odor. Cindy completed and signed a sworn statement for LE as she submitted some items that she believed the baby-sitter would have likely touched. [discovery doc pp. 6609 - 6610] The OCSO tested the items for fingerprints.

    ■Hair straightener – Casey claims Zanny gave her one
    ■Home videos – Casey claims Zanny gave her a few DVD’s
    ■Rubber football & soccer ball – Casey told Cindy these were Annabelle’s.
    ■Bambi Movies on DVD – Movies taken to Zanny’s for Caylee to watch.
    ■Air bed – Cindy claims this inflatable bed was usually kept in the trunk of Casey’s car, but has been in the house for at least 2 months.

  30. smoke&mirrors on 21 May 2010 at 21:01

    Here is what happened the next day (1 day before Caylee’s 3rd Birthday):

    FRI, August 8, 2008 – A smiling Cindy pokes her head out the storm door and told the reporters that she had a “good feeling about Caylee coming home.” Although she would not comment on the specific items taken from the home via a search warrant, she stated that some of those items were things she wanted them to have.

    http://www.wftv.com/video/17123368/index.html

    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    I think Cindy’s smile/smirk was because she thought she had solved the Zanny the Nanny mystery! After all, Casey told her Zanny gave her that hair straightener! :ninja:

  31. smoke&mirrors on 21 May 2010 at 21:08

    quarterhorse_trainer,

    I read the doc dump, but most of the forensic stuff is over my head! :w00t: I’m hoping ppl. like Val, JWG and others who understand that stuff will weigh in… breaking it down for us.

    Good night all.

  32. maze on 21 May 2010 at 21:29

    Smoke…hinky site is down for awhile.. :sad:

  33. Christine on 21 May 2010 at 21:34

    http://www.wftv.com/video/17123368/index.html
    Watching this video…..aside from the fact that Cindy is a Camera HUND SWINE or whatever you want to call her…….and she has that damn smirk
    on her pimpled face….which is also done up with makeup too, she keeps
    her head down and tries to avoid looking into the camera.

    She thinks she so smart, but NOT NOT, she planned to give LE evidence that would lead LE in another direction, away from Casey’s guilt.

    Lord, I hope they bring charges against this family for hindering and obstruction justice.

    I don’t think there has ever been a family as HATED as the Anthonys.
    Cindy is a sociopathic as Casey is and boy does it show.

    Poor Caylee, to have been born into this dysfunctional and lieing, thieving, and crazy family always showed me that Caylee didn’t have a prayer at all.

  34. humbleopinion on 21 May 2010 at 21:35

    Hi everyone! Smoke, seems it is over Cindy’s head too! She either has a headache, or that foreclosure is not letting her get too much sleep that night! :lol:

    I hope Valhall gets her site back up and splains this stuff for me. I am confused with it! But I do know, it has caused a stir with the d-team, or they wouldn’t be acting the way they are!

  35. humbleopinion on 21 May 2010 at 21:37

    Maze, I sent an email to Val with some info on the problem!

    Christine, thanks! And yes it it terribly sad that Caylee was born into such a terribly dysfunctional family!

  36. humbleopinion on 21 May 2010 at 21:38

    Smoke, that straightener might have come off of Cindy’s credit card…the one that Casey was hiding the bills on, and Cindy wouldn’t give to LE! what a hoot!

  37. humbleopinion on 21 May 2010 at 21:40

    That poo eating grin Cindy had on her face the whole time she “LOVED” the attention of the media!

  38. smoke&mirrors on 22 May 2010 at 05:29

    Good morning everyone,

    Richard Hornsby comments on point #8 in the Defense Team Motion to Strike State’s Notice of Aggravating Circumstances.

    http://www.wftv.com/pdf/23621475/detail.html

    Originally Posted by rhornsby

    Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.030 (Service of Pleadings and Papers) covers this issue and it is a non-issue; just more of Baez whining.

    The rule states that service “shall be made by delivering a copy to the party or by mailing it to the party’s last known address.” It does not require one method over the other.

    The rule goes on to say that “delivery” can be made by a variety of methods (hand delivery, mail, fax, substitute service, etc.) and specifically says that “Service by mail shall be considered complete upon mailing.” So Baez was considered served the minute the notice was in the mail.

    And the rule goes on to state that “All original papers, copies of which are required to be served on parties, must be filed with the court either before service or immediately thereafter.”

    Finally, if opposing counsel includes a certificate of service (which Ashton did) the certificate of service is taken as prima facie proof of service in compliance with all rules of court and law.

    So basically, Baez is just whining because the media obtained a copy of the Notice of Aggravating factors that Ashton filed with the Clerk of Court right before closing time on May 13; while Baez’s copy was still in the mail.

    There is nothing wrong with that and his complaint is pretty comical considering Baez pulls the same stunts all the time with his motions.

    _______________________
    “…the irony is rich” Judge Strickland quote

  39. humbleopinion on 22 May 2010 at 07:05

    GM!

    Hi Smoke, thanks! So that is what Baez problem is. And while he is claiming the state was leaking, they were really filing and the news was buying from the clerk.
    I do wonder how the defense submitted to the clerk with only one signature [Lyon]on this motion: http://www.docstoc.com/docs/document-preview.aspx?doc_id=35304539

    Because we know the defense is on the up and up and follows the law! :wink:

  40. humbleopinion on 22 May 2010 at 07:44

    Smoke, thanks for adding all the status hearings to the calendar! Much appreciated.
    Looks like the next hearing will be June 1 for the jail visitors log private and other decisions Judge Stricky made before he was brutally removed.

  41. smoke&mirrors on 22 May 2010 at 07:55

    Hi Humble,

    You are welcome. And thank you for adding the June 1 (Tuesday) date to the calendar. WESH just had the day wrong but not the date. When I attempted to verify the event on the Clerk of Courts web-site after 5 p.m. yesterday, it was down due to file maintenance.

    Just trying to help keep the facts straight and current. It would be nice if the blogs would come together and focus on doing same instead of spending time with all of the “sidebar” nonsense.

    Have to go now. BBL

  42. humbleopinion on 22 May 2010 at 08:03

    Hi Smoke, WESH is getting to big for their britches! :lol:

    I figured better add the 1 June hearing before I forget. Hate to not have it on the calendar and all of us forget it!

  43. Deb on 23 May 2010 at 16:33

    Does anyone know if this case will be televised? I would love to see the building of this case and not just see the verdict at the end.

  44. humbleopinion on 23 May 2010 at 16:54

    Hi Deb, Welcome! I believe this case will be on the net, but not sure about it being televised. Court TV might have it.

To post on the Caylee case: Caylee
PLEASE post off topics on: OFF TOPIC