James L. McIntyre
email remove
Submitted on 2010/02/01 at 5:37am
Caliper measurments (diameter) of rib bones indicate body of BABY girl. Body was nearly a year and a half TOO YOUNG. Detective/Corporal Yuri Melich arrest report Evidence NONE and yet he arrests her anyway. Lawson Lawmar made a career ending mistake using Casey Anthony as Political fodder. The first was a black male suspect, who is now a very wealthy FORMER suspect, now worth over fifteen million dollars because of Lawson Lamar’s premature arrest. Leonard Padilla must have gotten his spurs tangled, he is NOT ALLOWED past the state of Arizona. Dr. Jan Garaviglia signed the death certificate on the WRONG BODY, against the advice of the Pathologist who ACTUALLY did the autopsy and pathology work up. She was 85% certain that this WAS NOT the body of Caylee Marie Anthony. She wanted MORE TIME to complete her work and was denied by Dr. Garaviglia. She should concentrate on her day job and stop working for the Discovery Channel. SEVEN VIDEO RECORDINGS PROVE THAT NOT ONLY IS CAYLEE VERY MUCH ALIVE, BUT ALSO PROVE BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT THAT SHE WAS KIDNAPPED. AN EARLIER KIDNAPPING ATTEMPT PROVES THIS BEYOND A DOUBT! PUTRID BODY IN TRUNK OF CAR WAS SPAGHETTI SAUCE AND BEEF (MEATBALLS) GREASE LEAKING FROM A GARBAGE BAG! PROFILE OF CHILD IN FETAL POSITION WAS SPAGHETTI SAUCE FORMING ON THE EDGE OF A SPARE TIRE UNDER THE TRUNK FOAM! NO SIGN OR TRACE OF CHLOROFORM WAS FOUND IN THE TRUNK. ZENAIDA “ZANI” FERNANDEZ-GONZALEZ HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED AND IS BEING SOUGHT FOR THE KIDNAPPING OF CAYLEE MARIE ANTHONY. 3 RING MEDIA CIRCUS HELPED TO PLACE THE BALME ON A VERY INNOCENT CASEY ANTHONY. NANCY GRACE, JANE “THE GAVEL” VELEZ-MITCHELL ET AL WILL BE GETTING SUED FOR EVERYTHING THEY DON’T HAVE WHEN THIS IS ALL PROVEN AS FACTUAL. THIS TRAVESTY OF JUSTICE WILL NEVER SEE TRIAL. IF YOU DON’T HAVE A BODY, YOU DON’T HAVE A CASE. CAYLEE AND ZENAIDA HAVE BEEN SEEN BY SEVERAL PEOPLE SINCE THE LITTLE GIRL DISAPPEARED. SHE HAS BEEN POSITIVELY IDENTIFIED! THE PROSECUTION’S CASE IS FALLING APART. NOTHING WILL SAVE THEM NOW.
And one of the posts on this fruit loop:
Looks like James L. McIntyre is at it! He chose until 2010 to send, his SO called information via email out!
It states that Gloria Fernandez-Gonzales left with Caylee on 2 July 2008 for Hartsfield Jackson international Airport. She moved out of apartment 3310 when the lease was up with sister Daisy…………..[Have we heard about a sister named Daisey!]
Here is the LINK
Kind of fun to read an email by a nut who is known for having FALSE information all over the WEB!
Good morning all. Nice to be back to my normal schedule. Golf this morning, so I can’t stay long. Just read the above from that nut, McIntyre. First, I couldn’t eat pizza, and now I have to give up my spaghetti and meat balls. I’m famous for my spaghetti and meat balls. This is going to be tough. What is really scary about people like him is that there are those who will read these rantings, and believe them. I would think some of the computer geeks out there could possible trace his email back to a mental institution. Probably, having lost his ability to practice law sent him over the edge. He was disbarred, wasn’t he, if I remember correctly? Wonder if he sent that email to Mr. Biaz to help him with the defense of felon Casey.
By the way, I add 1/3 ratio of ground pork to my meat balls, not just beef.
I just love the part about Padilla. Half of Mexico can get into Arizona, but they are concentrating on keeping Mr. Padilla from going past their state borders. Too, too weird.
Also, I’m definitely no expert, but I recall that in order to identify the sex of a skeleton, it is the pelvic bones which are the indicator. I also watch Dr. G on TV. She is my hero.
I’m assuming that Humble will allow us to have a bit of fun with this blog today. Looking forward to other Humbler’s comments today.
I’m on a roll. I am also amazed that Mr. McIntyre didn’t find any chili in the trunk. Isn’t that Anthony gourmet?
By the way the correct spelling is Garavaglia, not Garaviglia. Just being nit picking.
Off to get another coffee. Anyone else want one?
Daisy Fernandez? That’s sounds as ridiculous as Guiseppe O’Reilly.
Here is the link to the Orlando Sentinel about the above. Don’t know if this has already been posted here yet. Can’t imagine this guy gets his name in the paper for his 15 min. of fame.
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/caylee-anthony/os-casey-anthony-zenaida-gonzalez-20100616,0,2828211.story
Are there so many people out there so desperate for infamy in their tiny loser lives, that they will go to any extreme for recognition?
This is all that WESH is reporting this morning. It doesn’t state whether they are being deposed by the defense or the State, just that it is at the State’s Attorneys office.
http://www.wesh.com/news/23930725/detail.html
Gotta go get ready. See ya all later.
Good morning muesli,
Here is the list of Witnesses who appeared on the original Deposition Schedule submitted by the Defense:
Scheduled for Depo: 17 June 2010
Special Agent Scott Bolin, FBI
Special Agent Steve McElyea, FBI
Deputy Sheriff Carlos Padilla, OCSO
Captain Angelo Nieves – OSCO
Dawn Murray, DCF
_____________________
Of course, we know the schedules are subject to change.
Have a good day!
HI FRIENDS LOVED READING THAT POST THAT GUY SOUNDS LIKE ALL CINDY.ATTACK ANYONE THAT SPEAKS THE TRUTH AND THREATEN ANYONE WITH A LARGE PLATFORM AS IF THEY THINK THEY CAN BRAIN WASH PEOPLE.THANKS HUMBLE WONDERFUL POST HUGS TO ALL…………
NANNA HEARTS TO YOU.I WAS THINKING EVERY BLOGGER THAT CAN WE NEED TO MEET FOR CONVICTION DAY IN OTHER WORDS CAYLEES DAY.WHAT DO YA THINK?
Hello Humble, and All. So what tree did this nut job fall out of? The one with Joy Wray hanging in it? Did C & G stop in and say hi and have lunch with Caylee when they were in New York, since she is there? Can you say Baker Act? Lock this guy up pronto!
HI CAROL SO TRUE.ID LOVE TO HAVE CAYLEE IN OUR LOVING AND SAFE FAMILY.HUGS
RIDICULOUS!!!
hey JH…good to see you…
only 11 months ’til trial…
LMAO reading Rick P. letters in his sister $indy
“You are so damn blind you need a seeing eye dog.”
”No one believes you or your lying daughter. I disowned Nate because he was a lying no-good little prick. I gave him many chances. (but not the million chances you have given Casey) No one was ever “missing” from my house”
Humble
Check your messages
Huh.
Cocaine is a hell of a drug. Hope this guy gets the help he needs. Maybe he and Cindy can split the cost of a Baker act?
A little background on this ‘man’:
I. Introduction
The Petitioner, James L. McIntyre, was indefinitely suspended from the practice of law by order entered by the Supreme Judicial Court on September 13, 1994, retroactive to June 29, 1992, the date of his temporary suspension. The Petitioner filed a reinstatement questionnaire on December 1, 1999 and a second reinstatement questionnaire on March 7, 1999. A hearing on the Petition was held on April 10, 2000 and May 8, 2000 before a panel consisting of Mitchell H. Kaplan, Chair, Naomi Gordon and Steven Sabra. The panel heard testimony from six witnesses, including the Petitioner, and received into evidence six exhibits. After the close of evidence, the Petitioner moved, without opposition, to reopen the record to introduce a letter from David I. McIntyre, the Petitioner’s brother. In consideration of the testimony, exhibits and arguments, the Panel recommends that the Petition be allowed subject to the conditions set forth herein.
II. Facts
A. Disciplinary Background
The Petitioner was admitted to the bar in November 1980. He practiced primarily in the area of real estate and conveyancing, and also engaged in the business of real estate development as a principal. He had no disciplinary record prior to the matter that gave rise to his suspension. On April 4, 1989, the Petitioner was responsible for a motor vehicle accident in which Stephen Martin died. In connection with this accident, the Petitioner was convicted of manslaughter, motor vehicle homicide, and causing bodily injury while operating a vehicle recklessly and negligently under the influence of alcohol. He was ultimately sentenced to a period of incarceration of 3 to 5 years, 5 years probation and 3,000 hours of community service. The case is reported in Commonwealth v. McIntyre, 36 Mass. App. Ct. 193 (1994). During Petitioner’s reinstatement hearing, he acknowledged that he was drunk at the time of the accident.
Petitioner was convicted in 1990. He appealed his conviction and remained free on bond during the pendency of the appeal, which was decided in May 1994. During this period, the Petitioner was convicted in Rhode Island of possession of cocaine on November 17, 1992 and again on December 21, 1992. These convictions resulted in sentences of periods of probation. On January 20, 1994, again as a result of cocaine possession, Petitioner was found to be in violation of the terms of his probation and sentenced to serve six months in an adult correctional institute in Rhode Island.
As a consequence of these convictions, Petitioner was indefinitely suspended from the practice of law. Although a temporary order of suspension did not enter until 1992, the Petitioner ceased to practice law a few months after the fatal accident, and has not practiced law since.
B. The Period From Incarceration To The Present
Petitioner was first incarcerated in a Rhode Island correctional institution in January 1994. In July 1994, he was transferred to the custody of the Massachusetts Department of Corrections and was confined in various Massachusetts correctional institutions continuously until January 1997.
After release, Petitioner completed his sentence by performing 2,500 hours of community service cleaning floors at Sturdy Memorial Hospital.1 He continued to do this work on a voluntary basis for some months following the completion of his required service. Upon his release, Petitioner was also on probation both with respect to his Massachusetts and Rhode Island sentences. His Massachusetts probationary term terminated on June 8, 1999, and his Rhode Island probation, which was at all times unsupervised, terminated on December 27, 1999.
Also as a result of the April 1989 accident, Petitioner was sued by the Estate of the decedent, Stephen Martin, as well as other injured passengers in the decedent’s automobile. All such suits were settled by payments made by Petitioner’s automobile insurance carrier.
Prior to the 1989 accident, Petitioner had engaged in binge-drinking, in which, on occasion, he would drink to a state of drunkenness, although apparently this did not occur so frequently as to impair his ability to practice law. Petitioner’s binge drinking increased after the accident. Also, prior to the accident, Petitioner had “dabbled” with cocaine, but after the accident, he began regularly to abuse cocaine. While incarcerated, Petitioner participated in the alcohol and substance abuse programs available to him in the correctional institutions. These included a drug awareness program, NA and AA meetings, and twelve step programs. Upon release, Petitioner sought counseling from the substance abuse program at the Attleboro Clinic of Community Care Services, Inc. He continues to meet with a counselor from this clinic on a monthly basis. He also attends AA meetings, generally on a twice weekly basis. Petitioner has not used cocaine since his initial incarceration in Rhode Island. He had a drinking episode in July 1997, which he reported to his counselor, but has not had another episode since that time.
While in correctional institutions, he read advance sheets and Lawyer’s Weekly when available. Since his release, Petitioner passed the MPRE exam. He has taken continuing legal education courses in real estate, conservatorship and practical skills, and also a computer course. He subscribes to Lawyer’s Weekly.
Since his release, Petitioner has lived with his father, now age 92, in Attleboro. During the course of the Hearing, Petitioner testified that, if reinstated, his plan was to practice as a sole practitioner in the Attleboro area. After the close of evidence, Petitioner submitted a letter from his brother, David I. McIntyre, Esq., an attorney practicing in Attleboro, in which Mr. McIntyre represented that, if reinstated, he will offer Petitioner a position as an associate in his office and is prepared to supervise his work.
III. Conclusions
On a petition for reinstatement, the petitioner has the burden of proving that he has the moral qualifications required for admission to practice law; that he has the competency and learning in law required for admission; and that his resumption of practice will not be detrimental to the integrity or standing of the bar, the administration of justice or the public interest. S.J.C. Rule 4:01, §18(5); Matter of Cappiello, 416 Mass. 340, 9 Mass Att’y. Disc. R. 47 (1993); Matter of Waitz, 416 Mass. 298, 9 Mass. Att’y. Disc. R. 336 (1993). In evaluating a petition for reinstatement, the true test must always be the public welfare. Matter of Waitz, supra.
Given the facts of the present case, it is also important to note that the Supreme Judicial Court has held that there is no offense so grave that a “disbarred attorney is automatically precluded from attempting to demonstrate through ample and adequate proofs . . . that he has achieved a present fitness.” In the Matter of Allen, 400 Mass. 417, 422, 5 Mass. Att’y. Disc. R. 10, 19 (1987). The question in this regard is whether the disbarred or suspended attorney has reformed and proven that he or she has rehabilitated him or herself from the character flaws that caused the events giving rise to the prior misconduct. Id. at 425 and 23.
A. Moral Qualifications
In the present case, the felony convictions which gave rise to Petitioner’s indefinite suspension did not emanate from his practice of law, nor from a purposeful intent unlawfully to profit from his wrong doing — but rather from substance abuse. This, of course, does not minimize, or in any sense excuse, the injury inflicted on the deceased Stephen Martin, the other passengers in Mr. Martin’s car, nor Mr. Martin’s family, by Petitioner’s wanton act of drunk driving. It does, however, to some extent focus this Panel’s inquiry on whether Petitioner has demonstrated adequately acceptance of responsibility for his action, contrition and, most importantly, the capacity to maintain his sobriety.
The record suggests that it took some time for Petitioner to achieve a sufficient degree of self-awareness of his substance abuse problem. Based upon the testimony presented, this Panel believes that Petitioner has finally done so. He experienced a lengthy period of incarceration. His remorse appears genuine. He has participated in drug and alcohol counseling and continues to see his counselor, Francis McGuire, regularly. The Panel credits Mr. McGuire’s testimony that Petitioner is sincere and dedicated to his program of recovery. While it is impossible to guarantee that Petitioner will not backslide, Mr. McGuire testified that he was aware of no evidence that Petitioner would not be able to manage the stress of practice without reverting to substance abuse.
Nonetheless, mindful that Petitioner was only released from correctional institutions in January 1997 and had an episode of drunkenness in July 1997, the Panel has recommended conditions to reinstatement that will require Petitioner to continue appropriate counseling.
B. Competency and Learning in Law
Petitioner has been suspended from the practice of law for eight years, but, in fact, ceased practicing eleven years ago. As he was admitted to the bar in 1980, he has not practiced for a period longer than he was actually engaged in the practice of law. By taking continuing legal education courses and subscribing to Lawyer’s Weekly, he has sought to maintain or renew his knowledge and competency. While the record does not reflect any lack of competency in Petitioner’s practice before 1989, the Panel, nonetheless, has some concern for Petitioner’s current knowledge base and practical skills.
The Panel acknowledges that Petitioner’s brother, a practicing lawyer, has offered him an associate’s position in his firm and supervision. The Panel, however, believes that more formal assurances that Petitioner has adequate knowledge and skills as he resumes practice is necessary, and therefore has conditioned Petitioner’s reinstatement on his obtaining supervision and mentoring.
C. Integrity of the Bar and Public Interest
Three members of the deceased Stephen Martin’s family testified in opposition to this petition. Their testimony recounted the grief and loss Petitioner’s drunken driving caused their family. The Panel credits their testimony and takes seriously their views. The Panel’s role is, however, not to mete out additional punishment2 but rather to determine whether Petitioner has met his burden of proving the criteria for reinstatement identified by the Supreme Judicial Court. That some members of the public may be understandably grieved by Petitioner’s reinstatement is not the standard. Petitioner has served his sentence, performed his community service, and appears to be attempting to reconstruct his life, while acknowledging the severity of his past misconduct. The Panel believes that his reinstatement will not do injury to the integrity of the bar or the public welfare. See Matter of Allen, 400 Mass, at 425.
IV. Recommendation
The Panel therefore recommends that Petitioner be reinstated to the bar subject to the following conditions:
1. Petitioner enter into and fulfill a two-year LCL sobriety monitoring contract; and
2. Petitioner shall be monitored for a period of two years by a lawyer-monitor acceptable to Bar Counsel; this may be Petitioner’s brother. Petitioner shall meet with the lawyer-monitor at least once every two months to review his cases and manner of practice. Petitioner shall have the duty to respond candidly to any of the monitor’s questions. On a quarterly basis, the monitor shall report to Bar Counsel that he/she has met with Petitioner and is satisfied that Petitioner is adequately handling his clients’ matters.
Respectfully submitted,
Mitchell H. Kaplan, Chair
Naomi Gordon
Steven Sabra
FOOTNOTES:
1The complete Order of the Court is available by contacting the Clerk of the Supreme Judicial Court for Suffolk County.
2 Petitioner’s original sentence of 3,000 hours of community service was reduced to 2,500 hours on motion granted by the Superior Court. 3 The Martins express concern that because Petitioner was a lawyer and from a respected Attleboro family, he received a more lenient sentence than others who committed similar offenses have received, or other special considerations. The Panel found no evidence of that.
I still think Cindy is the biggest LIAR in America, and she’s so stupid, she thinks people actually BELIEVE her!
Wonder what she and Georgie will do with the latest Blood Money? Bet they won’t pay on their mortgage….prolly another
cruise, more tats etc…
Good morning all. What happened to that weird post that followed Hadley’s last posting? It was so strange, and now has disappeared. Well, it’s another Friday. Wonder what the defense brings us today. Things are so quiet around the blogs, other than some comments about the A’s lastest embarrassing cameo. Seems like the calm before the storm. Wonder what our next “bombshell” will be.
Does anyone know anything more about the foreclosure on the A’s home. I seem to remember something about them wanting a jury trial. Never heard of that. Am I remembering incorrectly? Does it really take over a year of non-payment of one’s mortgage to be foreclosed upon? I know this has nothing to do with the murder of Caylee (directly, that is), but it just seems to be a continuation of the outrageous actions of the grandparents, which seem to have no end.
NEW BLOG: Chit Chat…………..
http://humbleopinionforum.net/2010/06/18/chit-chat/